Loading advertisement
Logo
  • Shop Now
  • Help
  • Handicapping & PPs
  • Entries
  • Results
  • News & Info
  • Royal Ascot
  • Breeding
  • Harness
  • Help
  • Shop
  • DRF en Español
  • DRF Recommends
  • Bet on Sports
  • DRF Pro Services
  • DRF Form Finder
Track Pages
Horse Racing News
Stakes Races
DRF TV
Race of the Day
International Racing
Beyer Speed Figures
DRF En Espanol

Judge sets aside Mullins suspension

Steve Andersen|Feb 17, 2012

A San Diego Superior Court judge has set aside a 70-day suspension against California trainer Jeff Mullins for a 2008 medication violation, saying that his rights were violated by the California Horse Racing Board during the hearing process.

It was not immediately clear whether the racing board would appeal Judge Lisa Foster’s 12-page decision, which was signed Tuesday.
Foster ruled that the racing board failed to allow Mullins an opportunity to be heard after the board rejected an administrative law judge’s recommendation in late 2010 to reduce a 70-day suspension to 40 days regarding the 2008 medication violation.

In her decision, Foster said, in part, that “Mullins’ rights to procedural due process were violated” by the racing board.

Mullins, 48, faced the suspension after one of his horses at Del Mar in 2008, Pathbreaking, tested in excess of the permitted level of total carbon dioxide. At the time, Mullins was on probation after one of his starters, Robs Coin, tested positive in 2006 for the painkiller mepivacaine, a Class 2 drug that is not allowed to appear in post-race tests.

Mullins served 20 days of a 90-day penalty for the Robs Coin positive in early 2008, with the other 70 days stayed provided he did not have any further violations for medications in Classes 1, 2, or 3 during a one-year period. The Pathbreaking positive occurred during that probationary period.

Mullins served a 30-day penalty for Pathbreaking’s carbon dioxide overage in early 2010. That year, the racing board sought to impose the previously stayed 70 days from the Robs Coin case, a decision that Mullins appealed. A hearing officer recommended that the racing board reduce the penalty to 40 days. The racing board rejected the recommendation in December 2010, and according to the decision, Mullins never was given the opportunity to attend a hearing to address the penalty.

Approached in the paddock before Thursday’s eighth race, Mullins declined to comment, referring questions to his attorney, Jim Maniscalco.
In a statement released by a publicist, Maniscalco said, in part, “The court’s decision is a tremendous victory for Jeff Mullins and for all involved in California’s horse racing industry.”

DRF Headlines

View All 
Stay Updated Now

Get the latest racing news, expert picks, and exclusive analysis delivered to your inbox.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Interested in News?

Google News

Download DRF app on your smartphone.

Download appDownload app

Events

  • Royal Ascot
  • Hong Kong
  • More

News

  • Race of the Day
  • Track Page
  • Latest News
  • Breeding
  • More

Tracks

  • Belmont at the
Big A
  • Churchill Downs
  • Gulfstream Park
  • Laurel Park
  • Woodbine

Handicapping & PPs

  • DRF Classic PPs
  • Formulator PPs
  • TimeformUS PPs
  • Daily Racing
Program
  • DRF Picks
  • More
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.

Careers
Help
Terms
Privacy

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.