Loading advertisement
Logo
  • Shop Now
  • Help
  • Handicapping & PPs
  • Entries
  • Results
  • News & Info
  • Belmont Stakes
  • Breeding
  • Harness
  • Help
  • Shop
  • DRF en Español
  • DRF Recommends
  • Bet on Sports
  • DRF Pro Services
  • DRF Form Finder
Track Pages
Horse Racing News
Stakes Races
DRF TV
Race of the Day
International Racing
Beyer Speed Figures
DRF En Espanol

Consortium seeks tighter steroids rules

Matt Hegarty|Jun 29, 2006

A national group seeking to reform medication rules in the United States will produce a position paper by the end of the year that will seek tighter regulation of the use of anabolic steroids, according to the group's executive director.

The position paper will address an issue that has long been at the controversial fringe of the U.S. racing industry. The United States is the only country in which nearly all major racing jurisidictions allow the unlimited and unregulated use of anabolic steroids, which are used to build muscle mass and restore horses' appetites after strenuous exercise.

"Everyone agrees that we need tighter regulation," said Scott Waterman, the executive director of the Racing Medication and Testing Consortium, which met on Tuesday in Dallas. "That's where we will be starting from. Where it goes from there is hard to say, since there are a lot of elements to a policy."

The consortium's board unanimously approved the drafting of the paper, Waterman said. The group has issued position papers on a variety of racing medication and testing issues, and many of those papers have been reworked into model rules and adopted by racing commissions across the country.

Use of anabolic steroids in racehorses in the United States extends from breeding farms to sales rings to racetracks. Regulation is considered a difficult issue because the drugs have legitimate therapeutic purposes and are not considered "raceday" drugs, since anabolics confer their benefits over extended use, rather than in one day.

Waterman acknowledged that regulation would be difficult.

"We have a lot of questions to answer," Waterman said. "Do we want incremental change? Do we want to go to a European, no-tolerance system? Or do we want something that would allow for judicious use, with a firm withdrawal schedule? It's very hard to answer those questions."

The position paper will likely be completed by the consortium's meeting in November, Waterman said, but he called that timeline "ambitious."

DRF Headlines

View All 
Stay Updated Now

Get the latest racing news, expert picks, and exclusive analysis delivered to your inbox.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Interested in News?

Google News

Download DRF app on your smartphone.

Download appDownload app

Events

  • Breeders’ Cup
  • Hong Kong
  • More

news

  • Race of the Day
  • Track Page
  • Top Headlines
  • Race Previews
  • Breeding
  • More

Tracks

  • Belmont at the
Big A
  • Churchill Downs
  • Gulfstream Park
  • Laurel Park
  • Woodbine

Handicapping & PPs

  • DRF Classic PPs
  • Formulator PPs
  • TimeformUS PPs
  • Daily Racing
Program
  • DRF Picks
  • More
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.

Careers
Help
Terms
Privacy

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.