Loading advertisement
Logo
  • Shop Now
  • Help
  • Handicapping & PPs
  • Entries
  • Results
  • News & Info
  • Belmont Stakes
  • Breeding
  • Harness
  • Help
  • Shop
  • DRF en Español
  • DRF Recommends
  • Bet on Sports
  • DRF Pro Services
  • DRF Form Finder
Track Pages
Horse Racing News
Stakes Races
DRF TV
Race of the Day
International Racing
Beyer Speed Figures
DRF En Espanol
Charles Town

Charles Town admits error

Matt Hegarty|Sep 15, 2006

Stewards at Charles Town Races in West Virginia on Friday ordered that the top two finishers in a race on Sept. 9 should be reversed because the placing judges mistakenly placed the wrong horse first.

The highly unusual move resulted in the redistribution of the $28,000 purse in the $15,000 claiming race, which was the second race on Sept. 9. In addition, the stewards said that penalties would be issued against the three placing judges at the track.

The order of finish will not be changed for the purposes of mutuel payouts, according to Danny Wright, the chief state steward at Charles Town. Racetracks typically do not address mutuel payouts when disqualifications occur as a result of an appeal of a race or drug positive.

Wright said that an investigation had revealed that the placing judges made the mistake because they did not review a mirror-image photograph. Stewards did not find any evidence that the placing judges acted deliberately or that the track's photographic equipment was inadequate or malfunctioning, Wright said.

"This was human error," Wright said. "Had the placing judges followed the proper protocols, the chances are that the mistake would not have been made."

Preston Herbst, trainer and owner of the horse originally placed second, appealed the official order of finish one day after the race took place. In the race, Seven Talents, the 2-1 favorite, was placed first, beating Kris Taylor, a 24-1 shot trained by Herbst, by a nose.

Herbst did not return a phone call on Friday.

Crystal Pickett, the Maryland-based trainer of Seven Talents, called the decision a "very unfortunate incident.

"That's one phone call you never expect to get," Pickett said. "For three days we thought we were the winner. You'd like to know after a race whether you're the definite winner, the definite loser, or in a dead heat. But I guess not in this case."

Wright said that all three judges were in the stand when the incident occurred, and that they admitted they had made a mistake at the Friday hearing.

DRF Headlines

View All 
Stay Updated Now

Get the latest racing news, expert picks, and exclusive analysis delivered to your inbox.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Interested in News?

Google News

Download DRF app on your smartphone.

Download appDownload app

Events

  • Breeders’ Cup
  • Hong Kong
  • More

news

  • Race of the Day
  • Track Page
  • Top Headlines
  • Race Previews
  • Breeding
  • More

Tracks

  • Belmont at the
Big A
  • Churchill Downs
  • Gulfstream Park
  • Laurel Park
  • Woodbine

Handicapping & PPs

  • DRF Classic PPs
  • Formulator PPs
  • TimeformUS PPs
  • Daily Racing
Program
  • DRF Picks
  • More
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.

Careers
Help
Terms
Privacy

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.