Loading advertisement
Logo
  • Shop Now
  • Help
  • Handicapping & PPs
  • Entries
  • Results
  • News & Info
  • Royal Ascot
  • Breeding
  • Harness
  • Help
  • Shop
  • DRF en Español
  • DRF Recommends
  • Bet on Sports
  • DRF Pro Services
  • DRF Form Finder
  • Horse Watch
Track Pages
Horse Racing News
Stakes Races
DRF TV
Race of the Day
International Racing
Beyer Speed Figures
DRF En Espanol

AmTote, Elite Turf Club release statement on CAW lawsuit

Matt Hegarty|Oct 31, 2025

Two of the companies named as defendants in a recent class-action lawsuit regarding computer-assisted wagering have said in a joint statement that they will “vigorously defend” themselves.

AmTote International and Elite Turf Club, two companies owned by 1/ST Racing and Gaming, are the first companies to respond to the lawsuit, which was filed last Friday. The suit alleges that racetracks and bet-processing companies have conspired “to divert money in the betting pools” from everyday players to the CAW groups.

The statement says that the “claims are meritless,” and it goes on to say that the lawsuit “fundamentally misrepresents the nature of computer-assisted wagering” and the roles played by the defendants, which also include Churchill Downs Inc. and the New York Racing Association.

“Claims that CAWs receive an unfair advantage are unfounded and ignore the safeguards built into the regulatory and technological framework of racing,” the statement says.

:: Access the most trusted data and information in horse racing! DRF Past Performances and Picks are available now.

The response hints that if the case goes to trial, the defendants are likely to base their arguments on the claim that advantages received by CAWs – such as rebates and last-second access to the pools – are common elements of “high-volume” businesses that do not fundamentally alter the chances that CAWs will win bets.

“These benefits do not offer any advantage in wagering outcomes,” the statement said. “It is a customer-incentive program that is important to not only our business but the industry.”

The progress of the lawsuit will be closely watched in the racing industry due to the outsized impact that CAWs have on pari-mutuel pools and industry revenues, as well as the controversy the programs have generated over the past two decades. While only one plaintiff was named in the lawsuit when it was filed, the firm that filed the suit has been encouraging other bettors to join the class.

NYRA has yet to comment on the suit, while Churchill Downs has not responded to requests for comment.

AmTote and Elite said in the statement that they will not comment further on the suit “at this time.”

:: Want to learn more about handicapping and wagering? Check out DRF's Handicapping 101 and Wagering 101 pages.

DRF Headlines

View All 
Stay Updated Now

Get the latest racing news, expert picks, and exclusive analysis delivered to your inbox.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Interested in News?

Google News

Download DRF app on your smartphone.

Download appDownload app

Events

  • Royal Ascot
  • Hong Kong
  • More

News

  • Race of the Day
  • Track Pages
  • Latest News
  • Breeding
  • More

Tracks

  • Belmont at the
Big A
  • Churchill Downs
  • Gulfstream Park
  • Laurel Park
  • Woodbine

Handicapping & PPs

  • DRF Classic PPs
  • Formulator PPs
  • TimeformUS PPs
  • Daily Racing
Program
  • DRF Picks
  • More
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.

Careers
Help
Terms
Privacy

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.