Loading advertisement
Logo
  • Shop Now
  • Help
  • Handicapping & PPs
  • Entries
  • Results
  • News & Info
  • Royal Ascot
  • Breeding
  • Harness
  • Help
  • Shop
  • DRF en Español
  • DRF Recommends
  • Bet on Sports
  • DRF Pro Services
  • DRF Form Finder
Track Pages
Horse Racing News
Stakes Races
DRF TV
Race of the Day
International Racing
Beyer Speed Figures
DRF En Espanol

Texas seeks restraining order against Twinspires

Matt Hegarty|Feb 25, 2026

The state of Texas has filed a lawsuit seeking a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction that would prevent Churchill Downs Inc. from accepting bets from state residents through its account-wagering company, according to court records.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Collin County District Court, was filed in response to Churchill’s entry into the state in January despite laws restricting parimutuel wagering in Texas to licensed racetracks. The Texas Racing Commission sent a cease-and-desist order to Churchill’s account-wagering company, Twinspires, in February, but the suit indicates that Churchill did not comply with the order.

Churchill spokeswoman Jeanna Burkhead Cunningham said the company would not comment on the lawsuit on Wednesday morning, including an inquiry over whether Twinspires continues to accept bets from Texas residents.

The suit was first reported by Horseracingnation.com.

Churchill has been aggressively pushing the reach of its account-wagering activities over the past two years in an attempt to establish a legal foundation for entering markets that have been traditionally closed off. Texas is one of the biggest markets in the country, but the state has strict rules on parimutuel gambling and is one of the few states in the United States that has yet to authorize sports betting.

Earlier this year, a federal court dismissed an attempt by Michigan to revoke the state-issued license held by Twinspires after the company refused to comply with a cease-and-desist order there. The court ruled that a Michigan regulation tying an account-wagering license to a live-racing licensee in the state “interferes” with the legal framework established by the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978.

Churchill had argued in court filings that its account-wagering bets were accepted in Oregon because its bet-processing hub was located in that state, and not in the state where the resident placed the bet. While a lower court accepted that principle, the court that dismissed the case did not cite that rationale in the dismissal.

The Interstate Horseracing Act requires agreements from the “host” regulatory authority, the racetrack providing the signal, and the horsemen of the simulcasting track. At a Texas Racing Commission meeting on Feb. 11, the executive director of the Texas Thoroughbred Association, Tracy Sheffield, told commissioners that the organization was opposed to the entry of Twinspires into the state.

:: Want to learn more about handicapping and wagering? Check out DRF's Handicapping 101 and Wagering 101 pages.

DRF Headlines

View All 
Stay Updated Now

Get the latest racing news, expert picks, and exclusive analysis delivered to your inbox.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Interested in News?

Google News

Download DRF app on your smartphone.

Download appDownload app

Events

  • Royal Ascot
  • Hong Kong
  • More

News

  • Race of the Day
  • Track Page
  • Latest News
  • Breeding
  • More

Tracks

  • Belmont at the
Big A
  • Churchill Downs
  • Gulfstream Park
  • Laurel Park
  • Woodbine

Handicapping & PPs

  • DRF Classic PPs
  • Formulator PPs
  • TimeformUS PPs
  • Daily Racing
Program
  • DRF Picks
  • More
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.

Careers
Help
Terms
Privacy

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.