Loading advertisement
Logo
  • Shop Now
  • Help
  • Handicapping & PPs
  • Entries
  • Results
  • News & Info
  • Breeding
  • Harness
  • Help
  • Shop
  • DRF en Español
  • DRF Recommends
  • Bet on Sports
  • DRF Pro Services
  • DRF Form Finder
  • Horse Watch
Track Pages
Horse Racing News
Stakes Races
DRF TV
Race of the Day
International Racing
Beyer Speed Figures
DRF En Espanol
Belmont Park

Differing pace scenarios necessitated second look at Beyer Figures for Belmont, Brooklyn

Andrew Beyer|Jun 13, 2022

After Mo Donegal earned a Beyer Speed Figure of 98 winning the Belmont Stakes, some readers looked at the data for the day and questioned whether that number should be higher.

Mo Donegal ran the 1 1/2 miles of the Belmont in 2:28.28. Earlier in the card, some of the best older long-distance runners in the East contested the prestigious Brooklyn Stakes, and Fearless won it in a slow 2:30.45. He received a Beyer Figure of 95. Mo Donegal ran significantly faster than Fearless; so why didn’t he get a significantly higher figure?

As we made our figures on Saturday, the speed of the racing surface appeared consistent throughout the day. Our track variant – the calculation which indicates the inherent speed of the racing strip – was the same for race 1 as it was for race 9, when Flightline won the Met Mile with a smashing figure of 112.

Applying this track variant to the Belmont Stakes produced a figure of 98, which was in line with the top finishers’ previous performances. Mo Donegal had earned figures of 96 and 96 in his two prior starts; he improved slightly in the Belmont. Nest had earned figures of 91 and 92 in her last two starts and got a 95 in the Belmont.

The Belmont figure made perfect sense. The apparent aberration on the card was the Brooklyn. If we applied our track variant to this race, the winning figure would have been 84 – which was virtually impossible.

The veteran campaigners in this field typically ran in the mid- to upper 90s. Fearless had earned figures of 96, 98, and 96 in his last three starts.

What happened? The only explanation we can conceive is that the slow early pace in the Brooklyn prevented the horses from recording a good final time. They ran the first six furlongs in 1:15.15, compared to 1:13.23 for the early fractions of the Belmont. The Brooklyn runners would have needed to accelerate dramatically to record a final time close to that of the Belmont. but they couldn’t do it.

When a slow pace creates an implausibly slow final time – a common scenario in turf races – we will arbitrarily assign the race a figure that better reflects the true ability of the horses in the field. The 95 assigned to the Brooklyn gave each of the top three finishers a figure within one point of his most recent start. We would have preferred to make figures based on a single track variant, but we are confident that 98 for Mo Donegal and 95 for Fearless are the right numbers.

DRF Headlines

View All 
Stay Updated Now

Get the latest racing news, expert picks, and exclusive analysis delivered to your inbox.

Sign Up for Newsletter

Interested in News?

Google News

Download DRF app on your smartphone.

Download appDownload app

Events

  • Royal Ascot
  • Hong Kong
  • More

News

  • Race of the Day
  • Track Pages
  • Latest News
  • Breeding
  • More

Tracks

  • Belmont at the
Big A
  • Churchill Downs
  • Gulfstream Park
  • Laurel Park
  • Woodbine

Handicapping & PPs

  • DRF Classic PPs
  • Formulator PPs
  • TimeformUS PPs
  • Daily Racing
Program
  • DRF Picks
  • More
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center
Drf en espanolPurchase ppspreference center

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.

Careers
Help
Terms
Privacy

© 2026 Daily Racing Form.  All rights reserved.