01/30/2016 9:23PM

Watchmaker: You got to love new NHC champ's attitude

Email

LAS VEGAS - Moments after winning the 17th Daily Racing Form/NTRA National Handicapping Championship here Saturday afternoon at Treasure Island Las Vegas, and a first place purse of $800,000, Paul Matties had this to say: “Whenever I meet someone and they say they are a horseplayer, I automatically like them, and know they are smarter than anyone else.”

Obviously, we all can feel very good about our new NHC champion.

Matties, who pinpointed the victory by R B Rainbow Dash at 22-1 in Saturday’s sixth race at Tampa Bay Downs as the turning point in his tournament, was powerful in this NHC. He had to be to fight off a fierce challenge from runner-up Roger Cettina, and the remainder of a salty Final Table of 10.

In addition to Cettina, who was also the runner-up in the NHC in 2013, this Final Table included Matties’s brother, Duke, who was in his 12th straight NHC; tournament veteran David Gutfreund; Joe Perry, who was in his seventh NHC; and Stan Bavlish, who won the NHC in 2007.

But as formidable as the competition was, once Matties took command Saturday, he proved iron on the lead. This was not a surprise, as he is as seasoned a tournament player as you will find on the circuit. And Matties is a worthy successor to John Oneil, the NHC 16 champion whose rein was an exhibition of pure class.

How can the Final Table concept be improved?

The NHC is a great event, and it was made even better with the introduction of the Final Table of 10 two years ago. But I do think a few tweaks should be considered to ensure the final table is competitive beyond a two- or three-person competition.

Matties came into the Final Table round with a point score of 368.10, which was $50 more than the third place contestant after the semifinals, and more than $100 more than the 10th and final member of the Final Table. In other words, many of the members of the Final Table had no realistic chance of catching Matties.

Now, that does speak to how strong a tournament Matties had, and he should reap every benefit of what he earned through 46 plays in the first 2 1/2 days of the tournament. However, if you are going to have a Final Table of 10, then you have to give contestants seven through 10 some hope of winning, because the way it has gone in the first three years of the Final Table, it’s clear they don’t have much of a shot.

I don’t like the idea of reverting to cash tournament play for the Final Table, where a contestant can go all in at a point of their choosing. I really don’t like the idea of completely changing the format of the tournament at the final stage.

Perhaps a better idea might be to offer the Final Table contestants one “push” play, where instead of a $2 win/place wager, they might get a $10 win/place wager. That could give some of the Final Table trailers a chance at winning, and the concept remains true to the DNA of the NHC.

But if that, too, seems unfair to a Final Table leader who has built a commanding lead because he has been just that much better than everyone else, then maybe a better tweak would be to reduce the Final Table to five contestants. That might narrow the field to folks who have a realistic chance of winning.

Mohaymen, Cathryn Sophia impress

The two best horses I saw race Saturday were very likely the two best everyone else saw race – Mohaymen and Cathryn Sophia.

I know Mohaymen was right on top of a slow pace in the Holy Bull, and in general, I tend to downgrade horses who win after getting great trips being with slow early paces. But it was different with Mohaymen. He was just so dominant winning the Holy Bull; his 3 1/2-length win margin really doesn’t do him justice. And he romped while not being fully cranked what with much bigger fish to fry down the road. Mohaymen is a very serious 3-year-old, and what he did Saturday should make him a clear future book favorite for the Kentucky Derby.

Also, don’t be thrown by Mohaymen’s preliminary Beyer Figure of 95. The Holy Bull was Gulfstream’s only dirt route on the card, and the slow early pace had to knock that number down to some extent.

As for Cathryn Sophia, she was 1-10 in the Forward Gal earlier in the Gulfstream card, so she was expected to win big. She also wound up running her seven furlongs .23 of a second slower than Awesome Banner did winning the Swale for males at 4-5 in the very next race. But this was all about how Cathryn Sophia won.

Cathryn Sophia ran her overmatched opposition silly from the start in her first two starts, which she won by ridiculously large margins. But on Saturday, Cathryn Sophia didn’t break sharply, and found herself boxed in behind horses. She showed a new dimension overcoming a trip alien to what she has known, and she overcame it with impressive style.

2016 NHC final top 10

FINISH NAME FINAL BANKROLL PRIZE
1 Paul Matties $399.50 $800,000 (and Eclipse Award for Horseplayer of the Year)
2 Roger Cettina $389.10 $250,000
3 Charlie Davis $340.60 $125,000
4 Duke Matties $337.30 $100,000
5 David Gutfreund $331.80 $75,000
6 Joe Perry $319.40 $65,000
7 Peter Deys $307.80 $59,000
8 Ernie Powers $304.90 $54,000
9 Stanley Bavlish $284.20 $52,000
10 Mark Richards $283.20 $50,000

 

skyscraper6193 More than 1 year ago
Paul Matties worked hard for 2 1/2 days to gain the lead he had going into the final table. I tried my hardest to catch him but came up short. We shouldn't change it at all....Congrats to Paul well done....RC
DRFWatchmaker More than 1 year ago
Roger, first, congratulations on yet another tremendous NHC performance. As noted in my column, we must respect the work the leaders do during the first 2 1/2 days of the tournament. But you went into Saturday's Final Table in second place. I wonder if you might feel differently about tweaking the Final Table set up if you went into the Final Table on Saturday in ninth or 10th position.
Ann Maree More than 1 year ago
Enjoyed your comments on the Gulfstream stars, Moyhaymen and Cathryn Sophia. Wish we could see more of your weekly commentary on racing action, Mike, especially during the Derby Prep season. Not being a "member" of the DRF Plus group (and I must say I wouldn't join under any conditions), your columns are not widely accessible to many of your fans. I resent having to see those red plus signs every time I open DRF (which is less and less these days). JMHO
Lyle Jones More than 1 year ago
Facebook is a logical spot for any articles.....or use it to connect to other blogs.
Mark Everhart More than 1 year ago
If you are going to make a final table of 10, then make the format 4 Mandatory races and 4 optional on 3 tracks. if you think this will take too long then make the tracks morning tracks. Or make it an afternoon event. 5th race on of morning tracks to the 5 race of some afternoon tracks.
Billy Blake More than 1 year ago
Why exactly can't DRF employees play in this? Plenty of people within the industry can but feel like DRF employees are singled out. Is it because of the sponsorship of the contest? Just asking these questions because it's silly to me that DRF employees can't get a crack at $800,000.
JimmyQVegas More than 1 year ago
It's standard in any contest employees are not allowed Period plus the nv gaming board would never allow that to happen as long as this contest here. Would just look horrible if an employee of the sponsor ever won... No way is it worth taking a chance on that black eye on this. This will NEVER BE ALLOWED AND NOR SHOULD IT
blakeonthetake More than 1 year ago
Mike Sexton owns the World Poker Tour and he plays in nearly everyone of the WPT events, including the WPT @Bellagio....fwiw
Bryan Waters More than 1 year ago
It's a lot easier to fix a horse race than a turn of a card in a live poker tournament.
702Ray More than 1 year ago
You've got to be kidding... This is a no brainer.. No way do you allow drf employees. In Las Vegas they won't allow that. It's just bad for the tournament .
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
My thought is the players at the final table should have to pay for their bets. I'm not advocating a cash game, only that if they lose the cost of the wager should be deducted from their total. In theory this automatically brings everybody at the table $28 closer at the start (more if you have a double down option bet), but it also adds another layer of strategy to the game without radicalizing it like an "all in" cash format would do.
Nick Pavletic More than 1 year ago
Mike, you're dead wrong! 2.5 days of handicapping should be rewarded! Changing the "final table" would invalidate all the work over that time frame. Way ahead, great...close top ten.... great too. $50 K is nothing to sneeze at! I would be very happy with that $50 K, with an opportunity of 7 more races to catch the leader. Often the last couple races dramatically changes the leaderboard. Yesterday, I think several final table "gamed" themselves out of extra cash by not just picking winners. Adding the extra optional races was a good idea, but that's enough already.
David G. More than 1 year ago
What happened to having the West Coast edge this year?
Jennifer Sumner More than 1 year ago
I like the idea of making all 7 of the Final Table plays at $4. Then the format is still true, the leader still has a deserved advantage, but someone who goes on a run can make up some real ground. It should take more than one play to make up the difference of a 46 play preview.
Chad mc rory More than 1 year ago
The NHC is grrrreat BUT why does DRF smear ads for it right on top of the Entries and Results?
Mark Everhart More than 1 year ago
Why do you have to have a final table in the first place? This is not poker. but if you are going to do that then make 2 or maybe 3 of the bets $4 win and place.