Updated on 08/24/2013 10:30AM

Travers Stakes: Verrazano in post 3 as 2-1 morning-line favorite

Barbara D. Livingston
Verrazano, who earned Grade 1 wins in the Wood Memorial and Haskell Invitational this year, drew post No. 3 and was installed as the 2-1 morning-line favorite for Saturday's Grade 1, $1 million Travers Stakes.

SARATOGA SPRINGS, N.Y. – At least as far as the post-position draw went in the battle of the Big Three for Saturday’s $1 million Travers Stakes, advantage Palace Malice.

Palace Malice, the Belmont and Jim Dandy stakes winner, drew post 8, while his top rivals – Kentucky Derby winner Orb and Haskell winner Verrazano – drew posts 2 and 3 for the 144th Travers Stakes at Saratoga.

Todd Pletcher, who trains Palace Malice and Verrazano, prefers his horses to be outside of the primary speed in a race. Moreno, the expected pacesetter drew post 6.

“I think when you’re outside of a speed horse, you kind of have some options,” Pletcher said. “We’ll still have options. [Verrazano] might just have to navigate his way around a little bit.”

Verrazano, who will be ridden by John Velazquez, was installed as the 2-1 morning-line favorite by New York Racing Association linemaker Eric Donovan. Palace Malice was made the second choice at 5-2, while Orb – the favorite in all three Triple Crown races – was made the 4-1 third choice.

Verrazano, a son of More Than Ready, is 6 for 7 lifetime, with his only loss coming in the Kentucky Derby, where he finished 14th over a sloppy track. Since then, he won the Grade 3 Pegasus by 9 1/4 lengths and the Grade 1 Haskell Invitational by a stakes-record 9 3/4 lengths, earning a 116 Beyer Speed Figure, the highest by any 3-year-old this year.

“He’s only lost once in his life, and he’s coming off arguably the most dominant 3-year-old performance of the year,” Pletcher said when asked if he was surprised that Verrazano was the morning-line favorite. “Those three morning-line favorites, it’s going to be very close in the wagering.”

Like Verrazano, Palace Malice is coming off a lifetime-best performance in the Jim Dandy, where he won by one length and earned a 107 Beyer. Five of the last eight Jim Dandy winners have come back to win the Travers.

“We’re concerned that we’re trying to match lifetime-best performances back in four weeks; it’s always a balancing act,” Pletcher said. “We just hope they’re able to come over and run their races. Everything we’ve seen in their training since the Jim Dandy and the Haskell indicates to us they’re still in peak form. You just hope that’s the case Saturday afternoon.”

At the opposite end of the spectrum, Orb will be making his first start since a subpar third-place finish in the Belmont Stakes. He was purposely given a break by trainer Shug McGaughey, who sent him to the Fair Hill Training Center in Maryland for two months.

“I’m surprised there’s that much separation,” McGaughey said about the odds. “I don’t think he’ll be 4-1 when they run it.”

Will Take Charge, the Jim Dandy runner-up, and Transparent, disqualified from first in the Curlin Stakes, are the co-fourth choices at 10-1. Will Take Charge gets a rider switch to Luis Saez.

Godolphin Racing has the uncoupled entry of Transparent, trained by Kiaran McLaughlin, and Romansh, trained by Tom Albertrani. Transparent was demoted to fourth place in the Curlin Stakes, while Romansh was elevated from second to first.

A coupled entry in the Curlin, Transparent and Romansh will be individual betting interests in the Travers because the rules allow for uncoupled entries in races where the purse is a minimum $1 million.

War Dancer, the Virginia Derby winner, will try to transfer his good turf form to dirt for trainer Ken McPeek, whose Golden Ticket dead-heated with Alpha for the win in last year’s Travers.

Golden Soul, the runner-up to Orb in the Kentucky Derby, will try to bounce back from losses by double-digit lengths in the Belmont Stakes and Haskell Invitational.

The Travers will go as race 12 on a 14-race program that begins at 11:35 a.m. and includes the King’s Bishop and Test – both Grade 1 races – as well as the Grade 2 Ballston Spa.

The Travers will be shown live on NBC in a 90-minute broadcast that begins at 4:30 p.m. Eastern.

Travers field

(Horse, jockey, trainer, morning-line odds)

1. Romansh, J. Castellano, T. Albertrani, 12-1
2. Orb, J. Rosario, S. McGaughey, 4-1
3. Verrazano, J. Velazquez, T. Pletcher, 2-1
4. Golden Soul, R. Albarado, D. Stewart, 20-1
5. Will Take Charge, L. Saez, D. Lukas, 10-1
6. Moreno, J. Ortiz, E. Guillot, 12-1
7. War Dancer, A. Garcia, K. McPeek, 15-1
8. Palace Malice, M. Smith, T. Pletcher, 5-2
9. Transparent, I. Ortiz, K. McLaughlin, 10-1

[removed] More than 1 year ago
This comment has been deleted
Sam Hiscox More than 1 year ago
get bit
Quite A Dude More than 1 year ago
Verrazano jogs.. On his way to BC Classic and HOY..
Charles Sakach More than 1 year ago
You may be right. I think he is going to make an example out of these on Saturday.
Charles Sakach More than 1 year ago
If the "numbers" are correct, Verrazano will devastate this field. In the Haskell, the track variant (based on the BRIS speed figure of 111) comes to 1.005. This means that the track was slightly deep; if you can parse the race into segments and calculate the feet-per-second for each, multiply by the track variant and the result is some far superior pace figures to anything in the field. (Basically, multiplying by 1.005 increases the velocity by 0.5%.) Conversely, the track variant in the Jim Dandy (based on the BRIS speed figure of 105 for Palace Malice) comes to .968. Again, if one can parse the race into segments and calculate the feet-per-second for each and then multiply these calculations by the track variant, one will see that the pace in the Jim Dandy is good, but not that close to the Haskell. (Multiplying the FPS by track variant will reduce the velocity by 3.2%.) The expectation is that Moreno will take the lead. I don't think so. Verrazano has him beat at every call according to my calculations. Verrazano figures to grab the lead immediately and take it all the way home. When that sort of thing happens, it is pure conjecture who might wake up for 2nd. For that reason, don't count out Golden Soul who is making his 2nd start after a layoff (dangerous on that alone) and didn't shoot his wad in the Haskell. I also see that Golden Soul ran the fastest quarter mile of the whole field (including Verrazano) detected between the half and 3/4s during the Haskell. (Golden Soul gained nearly 2 lengths; Verrazano only gained a 1/2 length in that segment.) Maybe...just maybe...
Horse Cents More than 1 year ago
No problem with your Verrazano pick, but you logic of picking Golden Soul second alludes me. Points of call have GS lengths behind leader as, 6.5, 7.5, 5.75, 14, and 29.5. So if I follow your logic, he should run big because he ran the 1/2 to 3/4 mark 3/10th of a second faster than Verrazano. But then rule out that at the next call he was 14 back, and finished last almost 30 lengths behind, and was slowest by far every step of the way after that call. Yea, I don't get it.
Charles Sakach More than 1 year ago
He was just coming off the bench. He needed that race. The intent was probably to get loosened up for the Travers, without spending the animal. Put yourself in the trainer's shoes...would you jeopardize what may turn out to be at least a good money finish in the Travers by running all out in the Haskell? Besides, it may be that Golden Soul's chances also rest on the added distance. Again, this is only speculation. However, I had him scoped out for hitting the board in the Derby; I was surprised he ran 2nd. This race is full of surprises too.
Charles Sakach More than 1 year ago
Here are my calculations. The number in parentheses represents the length of the race segment in furlongs. The number that follows is the point score per furlong based on FPS adjusted for track variant. 1. Romansh: (4) 15 (2) 15 (2) 15 (1) 12 rolling total: 62-92-122-133 variant .983 2. Orb: (4) 15 (2) 15 (4) 10 (2) 6 rolling total: 62-92-133-145 var .972 observation: should have had a prep in either the Haskell, Jim Dandy, or some other event. would not surprise me if he didn't hit the board 3. Verrazano: (4) 17 (2) 17 (2) 14 (1) 14 rolling total: 68-102-129-143 var 1.005 4. Golden Soul: (4) 15 (2) 18 (2) 10 (1) 3 rolling total: 62-97-118-121 var 1.005 observation: the "18" per furlong earned between 1/2 and the 3/4s is better than anything on the page. Could be setting up for a money finish. 5. Will Take Charge: (4) 14 (2) 16 (2) 17 (1) 14 rolling total 56-89-123-138 var .968 observation: started slow and began rolling. don't particularly like that scenario, but this was his first since the Belmont 6. Moreno: (4) 16 (2) 16 (2) 15 (1) 11 rolling total 63-95-125-136 var .968 observation: can't match speed with Verrazano. 7. War Dancer: (4) 13 (2) 13 (2) 14 (2) 14 rolling total 53-74-105-136 var .978 8. Palace Malice: (4) 15 (2) 16 (2) 16 (1) 13 rolling total: 61-94-125-139 var .968 observation: seems the 2nd best, but is he? When Verrazano starts buzz-sawing this field, will he fire? 9. Transparent: (4) 15 (2) 15 (2) 15 (1) 13 rolling total: 61-91-122-135 var .983 Overall: Verrazano looks like a lock. He looks to go right to front and not look back. When I see that type of race, something peculiar always seems to happen. Peculiar could be in the form of Golden Soul, who I give an excuse to in his last because he didn't have any chance at winning and was coming off the bench needing that race as a tightener. Add the "18" score for 2 consecutive furlongs into consideration, as this 1/4 mile was the best 1/4 of any in this field. If I were training Golden Soul, I would not have spent him in the Haskell when a good finish in the Travers could be a reality. I would have ran him just the way he was ran. I also suspect that he may like 10 furlongs better than 9. Besides, Golden Soul was the only 1 from the Haskell...other than Verrazano...to want in this. I don't see Power Broker or Micromanage. Why aren't these in the Travers? Golden Soul shows that he was trounced, yet he's coming back. Betcha we didn't see the real deal in the Haskell...
Mark More than 1 year ago
Curious if aliens have landed after reading some of these comments .
Cookie Smith More than 1 year ago
be careful of horses that freak at Monmouth..it's the kind of track that can lend itself big margins and figs that won't translate next out somewhere else..
Randy Baker More than 1 year ago
There's more spam on this site than in the whole state of hawaii
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Horse Cents More than 1 year ago
Randy, Anonymous, me, and only about 8 other people will get that. Very funny though. I do find it odd, that if anyone uses foul language, they will take it down within minutes, but I flag all the spam and it stays up for days.
sharjil More than 1 year ago
So, you guys think if Verrazano had to go another 1/8th in Haskell, he wouldve stopped ? What is the basis to think he wouldn't get 1 1/14 ? Did his pedigree change since Haskell ? I dont see anyone beating him if he runs his Haskell race again
Bryan Horn More than 1 year ago
Palace Malice wins but as I handicap this race more and more, if your forget that War Dancer won his grade 1 on grass at a mile and a 1/4; he is bred for this and he's bred for distance and he's a horse who rates just off the pace-stalkers. Not saying he will win but he's the 1 horse you hear nothing about and he may be a forgotten 20-1 by post time. Interesting.
Chris Lowe More than 1 year ago
War Dancer's dam ran ok at the Spa. Maybe an interesting longshot underneath. I still like Ramansh, who's top FPS figure is close to Palace Malice's and better than Verrazano's. Interesting that Mr, Sakach and I use similar pace and final time methods yet have different opinions regarding Verrazano....
bill n More than 1 year ago
20-1 LOL!!! You must be high.
zerosumzen More than 1 year ago
I don't get the separation I need, so TCTC (too close to call) and a pass. GL to all.
Cover2 More than 1 year ago
todd pretty much said it .........................PELL MELL,,,,,,,TOSS 2&3,,,,box rest uner