Updated on 08/08/2014 8:49AM

Stronach urges racetracks to ban race-day Lasix


SARATOGA SPRINGS, N.Y. – Frank Stronach, the billionaire owner-breeder and racetrack owner, has sent a letter to racetracks calling for collective action to ban the race-day use of furosemide, the diuretic known as Lasix that is widely used in North America to treat bleeding in the lungs.

The letter said that racetrack operators “are the only ones who can make a change happen, but only if we work together. I am asking that as stakeholders with shared interests, we work on a plan to phase in a ban on all [race-day] medication at our tracks.”

Stronach, who owns Santa Anita Park, Gulfstream Park, Golden Gate Fields, Laurel Park, Pimlico, and Portland Meadows through his privately held Stronach Group, called for all those who supported the idea to meet in Saratoga Springs on either Aug. 12 or Aug. 14. Several racetrack operators this week confirmed that they had received the letter but declined to comment on it.

Late on Wednesday, Churchill Downs Inc., which owns Churchill, Arlington, and Fair Grounds and recently reached an agreement to lease Calder Race Course’s racing operations to Stronach, confirmed it received the letter, and Chief Operating Officer William Carstanjen issued a response expressing a willingness to meet with Stronach on one of the dates. Stronach had not yet responded to Carstanjen by Wednesday afternoon, a Churchill official said.

“This is an extremely important issue to us and we look forward to sitting down to discuss this topic,” Carstanjen responded, according to the official.

The Stronach letter was sent shortly after a group of 25 trainers signed a statement calling for a gradual phase-out of Lasix. Many of those trainers are based in New York and work for owners who have previously called for a ban on the race-day use of the drug, which is legal to administer in every U.S. racing jurisdiction on race day, usually up to four hours prior to a race.

Stronach’s letter indicated that he would support putting in place so-called “house rules” that would prohibit the administration of the drug on race day. House rules are usually enforced as a condition of entry, but they are rarely used to implement policies that are not in place at other tracks because of concerns that trainers will avoid tracks with restrictive rules.

“We as track operators must do everything we can to eliminate race-day medications,” Stronach said. “The integrity of our sport and the safety of our athletes, both human and equine, should and must always be of paramount concern. I hope you join me in planning the implementation and promoting the elimination of all race-day medications.”

Tim Ritvo, the president of Gulfstream and a former trainer, acknowledged that the call for racetracks to band together to ban the race-day use of Lasix needed a critical mass to avoid dividing the industry.

“We’re very conscious that doing it alone would be virtually impossible,” Ritvo said. “Everyone has to come together. If there’s enough industry push, then it can happen.”

The Stronach letter and the trainers’ letter have reinvigorated the debate over race-day use of Lasix within a week of the Round Table Conference on Matters Pertaining to Racing, an annual conference put on by one of the most aggressive supporters of a ban on race-day use of the drug, The Jockey Club. On the grounds of the Fasig-Tipton sale Monday and Tuesday, discussion of the drug was nearly as common among trainers in attendance as discussion of the yearlings in the auction ring.

Just 12 months ago, faced with the reality that no state racing commission had approved rules restricting the race-day use of Lasix, The Jockey Club and other supporters backed away from their hard line on the issue in order to ease the way for the approval of new uniform rules that include regulations restricting the administration of the drug on race day to state or association veterinarians at a strict dosage. Under the informal truce, the two sides agreed to disagree on Lasix while the uniform rules were put in place.

Consensus on the uniform rules was won after years of negotiation between racing’s notoriously disagreeable factions, including trainers, owners, breeders, and racetrack operators. Now, according to several racing officials, the resurrection of the Lasix issue is threatening to break that consensus, at a time when a dozen states are putting in place the rules and other states are attempting to build support for the adoption of the regulatons.

The racing officials, who said they were neutral on the issue of race-day Lasix use, did not want to be quoted by name.

But on Wednesday night, a consortium of officials from horsemen’s groups associated with the Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association released a letter that was highly critical of the effort to resurrect the Lasix issue, stating that it was “designed to revive a divisive issue that the industry has already debated at great length and settled.”

“It will polarize the industry, cripple the implementation of the uniform medication and drug-testing program, and put the industry at war with itself once again,” the letter stated. The letter was signed by Alan Foreman, chairman of the THA, along with the president of the THA chapters in Illinois, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, New York, and Maryland. All of those states have adopted the uniform rules or are in the process of adopting the rules.

The letter went on to state that the THA chapters would “continue to strongly and vigorously advocate on [horsemen’s] behalf to oppose any change in current policy and practice, absent scientific evidence to the contrary or breakthroughs that allow for the horse to otherwise be protected.”

Echoing many comments made by supporters of a race-day ban, Stronach said in his letter that use of Lasix “has facilitated in creating the weakest collection of horses we have ever seen and is becoming a public-relations problem for our sport.” Supporters contend that both new fans and existing fans are turned off by the race-day use of any drug, even if highly regulated, and breeders maintain that Lasix use in North America is depressing demand for the continent’s bloodstock among foreign buyers.

Opponents of a ban, which include nearly every local horsemen’s organization in the United States, have cited scientific studies that have indicated that race-day Lasix use mitigates both the frequency and severity of bleeding in the lungs, a common affliction in racehorses. Approximately 95 percent of all horses in North America are administered the drug on race day, even though studies have shown that only a small percentage of horses bleed severely during exercise.

dewduckin More than 1 year ago
Try banning this for humans who depend on it to reduce their risk of having a stroke. Who is to blame when a horse collapses down the stretch and horse and/or rider are maimed or killed because of bleeding that could have been prevented by Lasix.
Jackson Jackson More than 1 year ago
A few other things worth noting . THE BEST stallions in the WORLD are straight up Northern Dancer & Mr. Prospector sire lines . This is common knowledge . They keep records of this stuff ! At Royal Ascot 29 out of the 30 races were won by ND's or Mr.P's . That's a straight up can't be denied FACT . So Stronach shows his ignorance with his comments on breeding regardless of how many Adena Springs he owns . You can't breed this out of them . They ALL come from the same handful of stallions and mares the breed was started from. How hard is that to understand all you breeding experts ? Even the most neophyte breeding student knows that ECLIPSE is the dominant line in 95 % of modern thoroughbred pedigrees . He is present in all of them. Eclipse descends from Bartletts Childers ... Otherwise known as "Bleeding Childers" who was known for bleeding through the nostrils as well as being a Champion Stallion despite being unraced :) Bleeding Childers was a son of The Darley Arabian .... So if it is hereditary there is no breeding it out at this point . But wait ... QH, Arabs, Appy's , Mules and so on ... they ALL bleed too . Explain that all you breeding experts ?
Jackson Jackson More than 1 year ago
Public relations nightmares ... STRONACH proposing to tear out the downhill turf course at Santa Anita to put in an amusement park . PR Nightmare !! Stronach having to redo his main track at SA umpteen times on purpose so he could launder money through his foreign business that did the installation. PR Nightmare !! Stronach installing untold millions of dollars of full grown palm trees in the empty parking lot at SA while simultaneously the infield tote had burnt out bulbs that went unreplaced for MONTHS ON END. PR nightmare !! No actual players want Lasix banned . Only Peta pretenders . If Lasix is banned I'll do just what I did when the BC banned it for babies ... I WON'T BET !! If you follow the money there is a good chance you'll find Peta is being funded by JC members to stir the pot. The JC is reaching for more power than they should have . It's a classic push from above and below to squeeze the people that PAY for the entire game . THE PLAYERS !!
Nathan More than 1 year ago
stronach's chemists have come up with something better.the bigger and richer the stable, the better the chemistry involved. the euros have it all figured out and since stronach now lives in Europe, so does he.
Senor Enrico More than 1 year ago
A ban on Lasix would destroy the American breeding industry. Almost every American stallion was a bleeder and produce baby bleeders. Who will pay 6 or 7 figures for such horses at the sales with no Lasix? Prices for European and Asian horses who are already better will sky rocket!
Laura Hicks More than 1 year ago
The TRA saying Lasix/Salix issue was settled is a stretch. Not a big fan of Stronach but in this particular issue he is correct and support. In 1995 when NYRA folded, we have gone from a few horses needing to EVERY horse racing on it. Every horse apparently suffers some form of EIPH, it is inherent and documented condition since the Bartlett's Childers 1716 aka Bleeding Childers, which is the sire line of Eclipse to which most modern TB descend. The TB managed 300 years without Lasix by breeding the best to the best based on largely unadulterated performance. EIPH also affected by health, conditioning and environment. Those that have a major problem (which is only a small % that actually need) should not be racing or adding to the gene pool. The reasonings for keeping, such as short fields, unwillingness to run, trainers inability to train or fear of barbaric/archaic methods used in place of Lasix are not valid reasons to continue to allow and small 'slumps' are temporary. The overall health of the breed and the sport needs the removal.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
good luck trying to fill the races
Slew32A More than 1 year ago
That's why they all have to do it.
Walt Gekko More than 1 year ago
What is needed is a five-year phaseout of Lasix that I would do like this: Year 1: NO LASIX FOR ALL Two year olds with NO Lasix either for the Triple Crown and Breeders' Cup events PLUS selected Grade 1 events. Year 2: Expands to ALL Grade 1 and Grade 2 events and ALL races for three year olds (only) through Belmont Stakes Day. Year 3: Expands to ALL Open Stakes events worth $150,000 or more. Year 4: Expands to ALL non-claiming races (including Allowance Optional Claiming). Only straight claiming events and starter/SOC events would be where Lasix would be still permitted. Year 5: Total ban on Lasix. This is how you do it where most horses currently on Lasix would continue to be on it while those who are in newer generations never race on it in the first place for the most part. This also would weed out many trainers who don't know how to train horses without Lasix.
Eric Singer More than 1 year ago
95% or horses receive even though only a tiny percentage need it! performance enhancer as well as anti-bleeding med? Stronach is right on - by breeding horses who have run on race day meds the breed has been massively weakened. The meds do not create the infirmities, they mask them. By breeding these horses the infirmities are passed on and the cycle continues. The reason the horsemen's groups are so passionately against the ban is that they know they have nothing in their barns that can run without the meds. Whenever this change is made it will be painful and it seems painfully obvious that the future of the sport hangs in the balance.
Mike Oliveto More than 1 year ago
Maybe Frank wants to revisit implementation of Horse Wizard terminals too.