- DRF Bets
- Handicapping & PPsThoroughbred Past Performances
ReportsPremium NewsDigital PapersHorsemen's Products
- DRF Classic PDF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF EasyForm PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
- Equibase PPs
- TrackMaster PPs
- NewsCategoriesTrack Notes
- StorePast Performances
- Compare all DRF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF Classic PPs
- DRF EasyForm PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
- Expanded Closer Looks
- Equibase & Trackmaster PPs - Thoroughbred
Steven Crist: Horse of the Year candidates a bit short on Grade 1 credentials
Whether it is Fort Larned, I’ll Have Another, or Wise Dan whose name is called from the podium Saturday night at the Eclipse Awards, the 2012 Horse of the Year will have had a below-average number of Grade 1 victories in his campaign for the sport’s top prize.
How far below? That was the question I set out to answer after writing two weeks ago that two Grade 1 victories by such an honoree would be a “historically low” number, which meant at the time that I knew it was low but hadn’t counted them up for each of the 39 Horse of the Year campaigns since stakes races became graded in 1973.
Now I have. It turns out that two (Fort Larned) or three (I’ll Have Another and Wise Dan, if you count his Grade 1 victory in Canada) is indeed below average (the average is 4.12, the median is 4) but has happened a dozen times before. At the other end of the spectrum, the exercise provided a reminder of just how good the very best Horse of the Year campaigns really were.
The tally is somewhat muddled by the changes in the grades of races over the years. Races that we now assume have always been Grade 1’s did not always have that status, and new races often had to wait a year or three to attain Grade 1 status. When Secretariat won the Canadian International in 1973, for example, it was considered only a Grade 2 race. John Henry’s 1981 Arlington Million and Cigar’s 1996 Dubai World Cup were ungraded for their inaugural runnings.
There’s a further muddle when comparing younger and older horses who have won the honor. Of the 12 Horses of the Year who won only two or three Grade 1’s, seven were 2-year-olds or 3-year-olds who did not race full seasons, such as Conquistador Cielo in 1982 or Charismatic in 1999. This is not to say that a truly exceptional 3-year-old can not win more: Seattle Slew (1977), Affirmed (1978), Sunday Silence (1989), Holy Bull (1994), and Point Given (2001) each won five such races as 3-year-olds. (Easy Goer actually won six Grade 1’s in Sunday Silence’s year. No, I didn’t vote for him.)
Here is the breakdown by number of Grade 1 victories during their Horse of the Year seasons. (A list of what Grade 1 races each horse won can be found on my blog at drf.com.):
Two Grade 1’s (9): Conquistador Cielo (1982) Spend a Buck (1985), Ferdinand (1987), Black Tie Affair (1991), Cigar (1996) Favorite Trick (1997), Charismatic (1999), Tiznow (2000), Ghostzapper (2004).
Three Grade 1’s (3): A. P. Indy (1992), Curlin (2007), Havre de Grace (2011).
Four Grade 1’s (11): Secretariat (1973), Forego (1974-75-76), All Along (1983), John Henry (1984), Criminal Type (1990), Mineshaft (2003), Saint Liam (2005), Invasor (2006), Curlin (2008).
Five Grade 1’s (11): Seattle Slew (1977), Affirmed (1978), Spectacular Bid (1980), John Henry (1981), Sunday Silence (1989), Kotashaan (1993), Holy Bull (1994), Skip Away (1998), Point Given (2001), Rachel Alexandra (2009), Zenyatta (2010).
Six Grade 1’s (2): Affirmed (1979), Alysheba (1988).
Seven Grade 1’s (1): Azeri (2002).
Eight Grade 1’s (2): Lady’s Secret (1986), Cigar (1995).
Of the 11 horses who won five Grade 1’s en route to Horse of the Year honors, all but Kotashaan (all turf) are already in the Hall of Fame or shoo-ins when they become eligible (Rachel Alexandra, Zenyatta). To look back at the campaigns of the two who won eight Grade 1’s in a year – more than all three Horse of the Year finalists combined to do in 2012 – is to marvel at what seems like a bygone era of true barnstorming.
Lady’s Secret made an astounding 15 starts in 1986, 13 of them in Grade 1 races, winning 10 times: She took the Grade 3 El Encino and Grade 2 Molly Pitcher in addition to her eight Grade 1 triumphs in the La Canada, Santa Margarita, Shuvee, Whitney, Maskette, Ruffian, Beldame, and Breeders’ Cup Distaff. She somehow also found time to run second in the Apple Blossom, Hempstead, and Woodward, and third in the Met Mile and Iselin.
Cigar in 1995 was a more efficient 8 for 8 in his Grade 1 starts, with victories in the ungraded Massachusetts Handicap and a Gulfstream allowance race to boot. He reeled off his eight Grade 1’s from coast to coast, taking the Donn, Gulfstream Park Handicap, Oaklawn Handicap, Pimlico Special, Hollywood Gold Cup, Woodward, Jockey Club Gold Cup, and Breeders’ Cup Classic.
That’s the difference between a Horse of the Year and a Horse for the Ages.
Lady's Secret overpowered the majority of the racing fields that she hooked, but there was no matching Zenyatta's class, personality and charisma. She was a horse built for the spotlights and the finish line and we won't see another like her for a long long time.
Look at Lady's Secret's year again and tell me why Zenyatta is considered superior to her again?
You say the awards are Sat. night and I thought you meant this weekend but they're next weekend. Misleading.
Hi Steve, Interesting, as always, and Azeri had a great 8 for 9 season in 02. But as you point, out changes in the grades of races do occur over the years and my now (somewhat worn) edition of "Champions" reveals that the CL Hirsch Handicap (126 lbs) and Lady's Secret BC Handicap (127) were Gr. 2 that year. So although Azeri ran off her final 7 races in Graded company, the form shows five (5) to be Gr. 1 and two (2) at Gr. 2. Still quite a year. Thanks.
The real difference is back then we bred real thoroughbreds to race in the 12 furlongs Belmont and the triple crown. Today we breed them to breed and race them like quarterhorses in more ways than one and target the Met Mile. These wannabes dont run long enough to accumulate fans and followers. When the breeding stop producing the great handicap horses like Forego, kelso, john henry, that brought in fans, it mark the beginning of the end. These frail short career cookie cutter milers and sprinters do not race long enough today to develop a fan base.
Rachel a shoo-in to the hall of fame? Really? Because she could beat Nan and Mind that bird? If there is a hall of fame for three-year old filly's put here in. But I don't see Persistently or Zardana running down Spectacular Bid or Cigar. She doesn't belong anywhere close to those true hall-of-famers.
It was cheapened when Rachel won the award and that is why Blame got the shaft.
The award is given to the horse that had the most outstanding year versus it's peers. Since the award was cheapened when it was given to Zenyatta as a lifetime achievement award, who really cares who gets it anymore.
Wise Dan's campaign or lack of campaign would have been embarrassing from 2000-2009, he would have never made the eclipse award ballot in these years. Zenyatta's connections have lowered the bar and those that are unable to stay objective have followed and said by means of their votes and inability to hold connections accountable, that whatever campaign you put your horse through is fine. You'll get this meaningless award anyway.
I think what we are witnessing,is a new trend,.Horses no longer being campaigned longer than needed . A couple of Grade 1 wins and your off to the breeding shed.Just look at all the 3 and 4 year olds over the last 2 years that have been retired after a couple of grade 1 wins .Owners are not going to risk the potential breeding payday .The latest example (High Tail)who won the BC Juvenile sprint,than ran a fourth in his next race,Now retired . Isnt it weird how when a horse gets gelded they become so much more durable,so much less injury prone..?