- DRF Bets
- Handicapping & PPsHorsemen's ProductsReports
Access past performances
- The Wizard
- DRF Gameplan
- Quick Sheets
- DRF Picks
- Today's Racing Digest
- Key Race Report
- Positive ROI Report
- Moss Pace Figure Reports
- Debut Reports
- WE Handicapping Report
- Clocker Reports
Racing and Wagering InformationTools
- DRF EasyForm PPs
- DRF Classic PDF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF HarnessEye PPs
- DRF Daily Harness Program PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
- NewsCategoriesTrack Notes
- StorePast PerformancesHarness PPsPackagesDRF PlusREPORTSPICKS
Simon: Deconstructing the Lasix ban
By Mark Simon
It has been estimated that up to 75 percent of racehorses bleed in some manner during competition – yet approximately 95 percent of all U.S. horses perform on the diuretic Salix. The math here clearly doesn’t add up, perhaps belying the oft-defended notion that Salix, also known as Lasix, is a “humane” treatment required to “normalize” performance. Opponents of race-day medication suggest Salix is more of a performance enhancer, used by trainers largely to keep up with their peers.
Drug dependency is a big problem for our sport, one that weakens the breed genetically and turns off fans by the thousands – this according to a recent study underwritten by The Jockey Club. A growing number of prominent breeders have come to agree with this assessment and argue that race-day medication should be eliminated, especially from stakes races. Earlier this month, Breeders’ Cup Ltd., a breeder-driven organization, took the first steps to do just that on its marquee program.
This did not sit well with many horsemen, for whom medication has become central to their training regimes. In fact, the notion that drugs should be banned on race day has sent some of them apoplectic, leading to some hyperbolic, end-of-world predictions. Without drugs, they’ve warned, an unending procession of horses would pull up bleeding in front of grandstands across America, and thus destroy our sport’s otherwise pristine image − or, at the very least, our Thoroughbreds would suddenly become puny, frail, and unable to perform at top levels. Of course, horses racing in Europe have long competed free of race-day medication, a fact largely ignored in North American racing circles. Frankel, anyone?
Breeders’ Cup, to its credit, took the initiative and banned the use of race-day medication in its 2-year-old races this year. This gave both sides of the argument a chance to observe a working test lab at Santa Anita on Nov. 2-3.
While it was a small sample, results suggested that when horses are asked to race sans Salix, the sky would not fall, babies would not be snatched from the arms of their mothers, the world would not spin off its axis – and the homestretch would not be filled with distressed horses pulling up, unable to finish their race, bleeding in front of distressed fans.
Simply put, the absence of race-day medication appeared to have little effect on anything and, more important, may have actually demonstrated that far fewer horses “require” race-day medication than we presently see.
In the five Breeders’ Cup races for juveniles, 38 horses ran without Salix for the first time from 50 total starters. Daily Racing Form has reported that at least three of the 38 bled. There may have been more, but it does not appear to be a large number. If only three bled from that group of off-Salix starters, that would be 8 percent, a far cry from the 75 percent number normally kicked around.
Postrace scoping was not done on every juvenile starter, which might have given us a better handle on the actual instance of tracheal bleeding. Quite possibly more than 8 percent bled at some level or another, though that oft-quoted 3-out-of-4 guesstimate seems unlikely.
Despite 76 percent of juvenile starters racing without Salix for the first time, those five races turned out to be just as formful as the other Breeders’ Cup events: One juvenile favorite won, three favorites ran second, and one ran off the board. In the 10 events for older runners – where Salix was allowed – three favorites won, two were second, two were third, and three finished off the board.
Next year, Breeders’ Cup plans to prohibit race-day medication in all of its races, and it will be interesting to see if the betting public appreciates this, or whether it views the change apprehensively, not knowing how well their selections may run without Salix. This is surely a crossroads for the sport – indicating which direction we may ultimately go in addressing the all-important issue of medication.
While the debate regarding same-day medication will continue, results from a handful of races on America’s championship stage last week showed that the sport can do just fine without it, thank you very much.
Mark ~ Sorry to say but Breeders' Cup has reneged. Perhaps an article about the whys of this. What pressures (blackmail) were brought to bare?
Public relations issue for those using meds: If a medicated animal dies, it is blamed on the meds resulting in PR issues for meds. If an un medicated animal dies it is blamed on "natural causes" resulting in zero PR issues. Our world is rapidly becoming "all natural/organic." Society is adopting this world view in greater numbers each day. I would call your attention to the industry wide onslaught on Lasix discussed in this article. Kentucky and the Breeders Cup have figured out the way the wind is blowing and they are going to win. Right or wrong, the general public is pissy about meds of all kinds now...ask Barry Bonds and Lance Armstrong. It is the trend live with it.
Mark -- Have any US trainers tried adding pissenlit (a French term meaning "piss in bed") for Dandelion greens to their grass and oats? It's known for its diuretic properties, so maybe French trainers are already doing it.
“Simply put, the absence of race-day medication appeared to have little effect on anything…” “Despite 76 percent of juvenile starters racing without Salix for the first time, those five races turned out to be just as formful as the other Breeders’ Cup events:” ----------- So, how does this play into the oft hurled yet NEVER proven accusation that Lasix is a “performance enhancing” drug? I mean shouldn’t the Lasix form have collapsed in its absence? Shouldn’t the Beyers of those horses coming off of this “juice” have substantially regressed?
We need to close many tracks so that this sport can support itself once again.
It is unfair, to weaken an whole breed by using medications in large numbers that are simple race enhacer because of the proven diurectic . Proven is also that less than five percent will ever be bleeding through the nostrils and that an true bleeder will do this no matter how lasix you will administer. In hong kong btw they train and race without lasix, and it can be real hot down there.
If you think that 'the public' is going to become more enthralled with racing by taking away Lasix, and that they will wager more money... then all I can say is wake up and face reality. It is unfair to horses to train on a medication that keeps them breathing well, and then to take that away when their pulmonary systems are taxed the most. And I'm TIRED of hearing about horses in Europe not racing on Lasix. There is a big climate difference. When's the last time that it was 95 degrees and humid in Ireland? And, if you haven't noticed, the population of racing horses in Europe is far smaller than here in the U.S. Are you proposing that about 1/2 of all U.S. racetracks close? That's what will happen if Lasix is banned, and far fewer horses are able to race.
all race day lasix does is mask other performance enhancing drugs and that is a fact.we dont need any more evidence theres plenty of research out there on how lasix and other diuretics work,and there have been many studies done on how athletes use diuretics to mask other drugs.this is like arguing that the sun orbits the earth and not the other way around.maybe people should consider that some of the bleeding that occurs in 2 yos is actually caused by the all the medication that allows a horse to go beyond is physical capabilities and causes the pressure in the lungs.diuretics help remove liquid from the blood wich aliviates the problem,but it also removes the remnants of other drugs and reduces weight wich is why all horses use it even the non bleeders.
This article is as poorly researched and written as there ever was. Are the DRF editors asleep ? Hey Simon, don't let truth and facts get in the way of your writing. No wonder you are unemployed. Publishing propoganda like this does nothing for your credibility