- Home
- DRF Bets
- Handicapping & PPsHorsemen's ProductsReports
- The Wizard
- DRF Gameplan
- Quick Sheets
- DRF Picks
- Today's Racing Digest
- Key Race Report
- Positive ROI Report
- Moss Pace Figure Reports
- Debut Reports
- BreezeFigs
Access past performances- DRF EasyForm PPs
- DRF Classic PDF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF HarnessEye PPs
- DRF Daily Harness Program PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
Racing and Wagering InformationToolsHorse Racing Links- Race Tracks
- Casinos
- Account Wagering
- Breeding
- Racing and Charitable
- Contests/Games
- Regional/Free
- Radio Shows
Get the most out of
DRF's online PPs with
Learn more. - Entries
- Results
- NewsCategoriesTrack ReportsTriple Crown Special Events
Exclusive content available only with a DRF Plus Plan. See Plan Pricing. - Blogs
- Video
- Learn
- StorePast Performances
- Compare all DRF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF Classic PPs
- DRF EasyForm PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
- See all Pricing/Plans
REPORTS PICKS Harness PPs - Events
- Breeding
Email
The U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation has scheduled a hearing on Thursday in Washington, D.C., to discuss “the prevalence and use of medication and performance-enhancing drugs in horse racing,” according to a notice the committee posted last week.
Late on Monday, the committee released a witness list for the hearing. The list includes Barry Irwin, the chief executive of Team Valor; Kent Stirling, the chairman of the National Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association’s medication committee; Jeffrey Gural, the owner of several New York harness tracks and casinos; Jim Gagliano, the president of the Jockey Club; Matthew Witman, the national director of the American Quarter Horse Association; Marc Paulhus, a former vice president of the Humane Society; Ed Martin, the president of the Association of Racing Commissioners International; and Dr. Shelia Lyons, the founder of the American College of Veterinary Sports and Rehabilitation.
Irwin, an outspoken critic of raceday medication and the current state of racing regulation, said that he had prepared a 3,600-word commentary for the hearing and would summarize the commentary’s content during a five-minute speaking allotment.
“It’s basically what I’ve been saying all along,” Irwin said. He added that he “would like to see the federal government get involved in racing, because I don’t think the states have been doing a very good job with that.”
The hearing will follow by three months a congressional hearing conducted by a subcommittee of the Senate committee’s House of Representatives counterpart. That hearing, which was held in Pennsylvania and attended by five members of the 27-member Subcommittee on Health, was stacked with witnesses who advocated for federal regulation of horse racing, which is currently regulated on a state-by-state basis.
A member of the Senate Committee, Sen. Tom Udall, Democrat of New Mexico, has introduced legislation that would require lifetime bans for trainers whose horses test positive three times for “performance-enhancing medications” and that would put testing for medications under the purview of the federal government. The bill, which is viewed warily by many organizations in racing, does not define “performance-enhancing” medications.
The hearing will be held against a backdrop of a contentious debate in racing over the raceday use of the anti-bleeding medication furosemide, a diuretic. Many national racing organizations representing breeders and some owners have pushed for a ban on the raceday use of the drug, but horsemen’s groups representing both trainers and owners have resisted the effort.
Good luck Barry Irwin...you'll need it.
Can you imagine the PTA sanctioning different rules in every State? Having the net at a different height (lower) in New York for the US Open than at Wimbledon would be bad enough...but, compared to Kentucky and other States that are (ironically) even more liberal on medication, that wouldn't be half as low as the rest of the country has stooped...as it burries horse racing.
And, as for ' performance enhancing ' : this is misleading because its impossible to make a horse run any faster than he can, when properly prepared.The issue is enabling those who have problems (ones that are sore and should not be racing) to maintain their optimum level and/or recover their former glory.
|
Best Bets
OUR HEAT has a win and a second in two turf tries here. She has been favored both time but is meeting tougher today. Like her style, sitting back a bit early and then unleashing a strong closing kick. She seems to like the turf and graduated in a straight maiden grass race. The breeding is heavily slanted to turf. BEEZAROO has hit the board in her past five starts at this level. Has outrun her breeding on turf and scored her lone career victory over the Lakeside Turf Course. Rider chose top pick over her, but she's picked up leading ridder for this.
Most Popular
- 1.Posted 05/08/2013 04:00PM
- 2.Posted 05/18/2013 06:32PM
- 3.Posted 05/18/2013 12:16PM
- 4.Posted 05/18/2013 09:48PM
- 5.Posted 05/18/2013 07:47PM


