07/29/2013 4:26PM

Saratoga: Travers faceoff of Triple Crown winners in doubt

Email
Mark Wyville/Equi-Photo
Verrazano is headed for the Travers at Saratoga after this blowout 116-Beyer victory in the Haskell at Monmouth Park.

This content is part of a free preview of DRF Plus. Click to learn more.

The desired meeting between the three winners of this year’s Triple Crown races in the $1 million Travers at Saratoga on Aug. 24 is in jeopardy after Preakness winner Oxbow emerged from Sunday’s $1 million Haskell Invitational with a wrenched right front ankle.

Oxbow, who finished fourth to Verrazano in the Haskell at Monmouth Park, was pulled up after the race by jockey Gary Stevens, who did not jog him back to the unsaddling area. Instead, Stevens jumped off the horse on the clubhouse turn, and Oxbow was walked directly back to his barn on the Monmouth backside for evaluation. While X-rays were negative, Oxbow does have an injury akin to a sprained ankle, trainer D. Wayne Lukas said Monday.

The injury puts Oxbow’s status for the Travers Stakes – and a meeting with Kentucky Derby winner Orb and Belmont Stakes and Jim Dandy winner Palace Malice – very much in doubt.

“We’re going to go day by day, give him some time to get over that ship, evaluate him with no intent in sight at all,” Lukas said from Saratoga. “We’re not ruling out anything at all. We’ll do what’s best for him, let him dictate his program.”

DRF Plus Preview

Oxbow shipped back to Saratoga on Monday, and Lukas said the horse was comfortable in his stall.

“He never was very uncomfortable when he got back to the barn [at Monmouth], but obviously he was uncomfortable in the race. Gary probably protected him a little bit,” Lukas said “He’s comfortable today, that’s the main thing.”

Stevens said that Oxbow, who raced on the lead in the Haskell, did not feel as comfortable to him as he had in the three Triple Crown races – a sixth in the Derby followed by a win in the Preakness and a second in the Belmont.

“I looked over at Johnny at the half-mile pole and I said ‘I’m in trouble,’ I wasn’t going well,” Stevens said.

Johnny was Johnny Velazquez, who was aboard Verrazano, who was traveling exceptionally well at all times en route to a 9 3/4-length victory in Sunday’s Haskell.

The margin of victory was the largest in the 46-year history of the Haskell, eclipsing the seven-length win by Bluegrass Cat in 2006.

Though the final time of 1:50.68 was the slowest Haskell since 1978, when Delta Flag was timed in 1:53.20, Verrazano earned a 116 Beyer Speed Figure, which factored in the slow, dull nature of the Monmouth racing strip.

The victory – his sixth from seven career starts – earned Verrazano a start in the Travers, where he will get a chance stake his claim to leadership of the 3-year-old division against, among others, his stablemate Palace Malice. Both horses are trained by Todd Pletcher.

“We’re fortunate to have two such outstanding colts,” Pletcher said. “You hate to run horses against each other from the same barn, but in this case I think it’s the logical case for both horses and both owners. We’ll see how they both come back and both train, but right now it certainly looks like they’re likely to show up in the Travers.”

Palace Malice earned a 107 Beyer Speed Figure for his one-length victory in Saturday’s Jim Dandy, a performance Pletcher and jockey Mike Smith both called better than his 3 1/4-length victory in the Belmont Stakes.

“Just a very professional effort, got a great trip,” Pletcher said Sunday morning. “It seems like he’s learning how to run, learning how to finish off a race. He came back and showed everybody that the Belmont was real.”

[SARATOGA 2013: Complete meet coverage, exclusive DRF videos]

Since his third-place finish in the Belmont Stakes, the Travers has been the target for Orb. On the day after the Belmont, Orb was shipped to the Fair Hill training center in Maryland, where he has breezed four times since July 3. He will have another workout this weekend before shipping to Saratoga the middle of next week, according to trainer Shug McGaughey.

“I feel great with where I am,” McGaughey said. “Those two horses ran great races, but I feel real good with the way we’re doing. The way things are shaping up, if it all comes together, it’ll be good.”

Will Take Charge and Moreno, the second- and third-place finishers from the Jim Dandy, are scheduled to run back in the Travers. Will Take Charge, beaten double-digit lengths in each Triple Crown race, ran well to be second in the Jim Dandy, racing without blinkers for the first time since his career debut.

“He pulled up excellent, his appetite increased, we’ll go on with him,” said Lukas, who trains Will Take Charge.

Eric Guillot, trainer of Moreno, said he believes his horse is easily distracted and will benefit from having a race at Saratoga.

Transparent, who finished first in the Curlin Stakes but was disqualified to fifth, and Romansh, who was moved up to first in the Curlin, are both being pointed to the Travers.

Two horses not being pointed to the Travers are the Bob Baffert-trained pair of Power Broker and Code West. Power Broker, who finished second to Verrazano in the Haskell, was to ship back to Southern California and could be aimed at the Del Mar Derby on turf, Baffert said.

“He ran a real good race,” Baffert said of Power Broker’s Haskell in which he finished six lengths clear of third-place finisher Micromanage. “But that Verrazano freaked.”

Code West, who finished fifth in the Jim Dandy, will be relocated to trainer Wayne Catalano’s Midwest division. Both Baffert and Catalano train for Gary and Mary West, owners of Code West.

This weekend’s West Virginia Derby could spawn a starter or two for the Travers. Among those expected for the West Virginia Derby are Departing, Overanalyze and Betweenhereandcool.

– additional reporting by Jay Privman

JAHMAN More than 1 year ago
116 beyer speed figure wow inflating a stock to take a big tumble in the Travers
Jaime Dubyna More than 1 year ago
I don't understand how he got that Beyer. His time was just plain slow.
Allan Gauthier More than 1 year ago
Verrazanno beat 2 good horses.....itsmyluckyday,and Oxbow. Both of them came back lame.
Allan Gauthier More than 1 year ago
JV had his choice between Orb and Verrazano in the Derby and chose Verrazano. He certainly didn't KNOW much then.
Matthew Ellis More than 1 year ago
Will Take Charge is a serious threat in the Travers if all goes well in training up to the race. No problem with a mile and a quarter most of all value a good price especially sine Palace Malice and Verrazano are unbeatable in these insane Pletcher scenarios
john More than 1 year ago
Why don't folks look at verrazano's races. He hates dirt in the face and won't win at a mile if that happens. If JV keeps him outside and clean he runs like one of the best of the crop...if not he collapses so post will be key in the travers. I think PM is the real deal and has grown up since the derby.
Allan Gauthier More than 1 year ago
Ya.....going by a horse that was lame.
Lawrence Vaccarelli More than 1 year ago
VERRANZANO ,....a mile and an 1/8th horse and that's all he will ever be in grade 1 races..and this will be proven again when he tries the travers distance....so all you suckers who want to lose your money in the travers go right ahead and pony up on him at the windows.....makes the prices better for everyone else.
sharjil More than 1 year ago
ha ha ha..... You sound like you lost a fortune trying to beat him in Haskell. I can still remember suckers like you said he can never run past a mile or 1 1/16. Guess what.... He just did it very well.
Mark More than 1 year ago
These people been discrediting this horse since day one. Its one excuse after another. Suckers . He could have ran backwards vs the derby runner up another 1/8 and he wasn't catching him . He toyed with those graded stakes winners and placers.
Jim Fields More than 1 year ago
ONE THING IS FOR SURE, WHEN VERRANZANO HAS HIS "A" GAME, HE IS UNBEATABLE. I DON'T THINK HE KEEPS HIS CONCENTRATION CENTERED ON RUNNING EVERY TIME, AND LIKE SECRETARIAT, IF HE DOESN'T FEEL COMFORTABLE, HE DOESN'T PUT OUT 100%. SO, CONSEQUENTLY HE CAN BE BEAT. AS HE GETS OLDER, HE MAY LEARN TO RUN THRU ANYTHING AND IF HE DOES, HE COULD BE AMONG THE ALL TIME GREATS. IN SEVERAL OF HIS RACES, YOU COULD JUST SEE HIM PLAYING WITH THE OTHER HORSES GOING DOWN THE BACKSIDE AND INTO THE TURN AND THAN JUST BLOW AWAY FROM THEM. I DON'T THINK TODD EVEN KNOWS HOW GOOD HE IS, BUT I THINK JOHNNY FOUND OUT SUNDAY. TIME WILL TELL!!! IT COULD BE FUN FOR THOSE IN HIS CORNER
Elizabeth More than 1 year ago
I disagree. Im not sure we've seen his best yet, but on the other hand, I still have HUGE doubts about him getting 1 1/4 miles. I've always wondered why TP didn't run him back in the Preakness. Oh, I know timing was and issue and he had a few cuts, but those aren't really great reasons to not run him back. I think maybe he even wonders if he can get the distance. I guess they'll give him one more try and see how good he really is. As for the Beyers. They are a complete joke! Verrazano wins a race in one of the slowest times, if not the slowest, since the 70s while Palace Malice wins with the second fastest Jim Dandy since they moved it to 1 1/8 miles and he gives Verrazano a speed beyer that is 10 points higher than PM? I don't buy the whole "dead track" thing. His way of rating horse's races is SO subjective. If you don't believe me, look up the video where it's shown how much of the "facts" that are entered into his calculations are based on subjective scoring. He's loved Verrazano since the spring and he still does apparently. A 116??? Ridiculous.
Perl More than 1 year ago
Did you really just compare Verrazano with Secretariat? Also, is the Caps Lock function on your computer broken in the on-position?
Mark Scheider More than 1 year ago
I think they DO know how good he is. Did you see Velasquez look behind him going into the final turn when the horse wasn't even on the lead? He made sure the coast was clear to hit the accelerator and put the field away. They know what he has under the hood. The horse lost the Derby, so what? He is the best 3 year old of 2013. There is no argument.
Mark Scheider More than 1 year ago
Well documented that Secretariat MAY have never lost if it weren't for human error.
Mark More than 1 year ago
Agree
John More than 1 year ago
After following the postings since Feb. This is my conclusion. The majority out there are gamblers. That being said if their choice loses it's a blow to their superior handicapping skills. Hence a lot of self absorbed complaining, trip, jockey, trainer. It all comes down to money. The minority out there are those who follow for the shear enjoyment of the athlete, horse and jockey. This makes for an informed post without the element of anger, which is most evident in most posts. Close your TVG acct. and enjoy the sport. I did 40 years ago and still enjoy picking winners and losers W/O wagering.
Perl More than 1 year ago
Just enjoying the sport without betting...ha ha ha. That's a good one!
Elizabeth More than 1 year ago
Why? I've done that for years and years now since leaving the backside. Even then, I rarely ever bet on ANY horse. Once in a while, my friends and I would plan a day at the races and take $20 each and see what we could do with that. If we lost it all, we walked away. See, the whole "fixing of races" and the "they know who'll win around the backside" crap is just that, crap! It's EXTREMELY rare that anyone is caught cheating and rarely, except in the cases of extreme talent over the rest of the field, do the backside workers have any idea of who might win a race. Most of my friends and I, on the backside, knew the old adage..."You can win a race, but you can't win the races."
Perl More than 1 year ago
Fair enough. I was speaking partially in jest. I'm glad you enjoy the game. It's the most important thing for sure. But most people out there enhance their enjoyment and excitement by wagering. I wouldn't necessarily speak poorly of this group of people since the game would not survive without them.
John Howland More than 1 year ago
I didn't know TVG was around 40 years ago.In fact,I'll bet you they weren't.But just for fun,because I love winning bets when I have no money riding on them.
Jimmy Metzger More than 1 year ago
If the reason we gamblers are upset and, therefore, engaging in "self-absorbed complaining," is that we took a blow to our handicapping skills, what difference does it make to our self-esteem if we bet on the race or not?
Sam Shelby More than 1 year ago
And with all that said, you are a self absorbed idiot.
DavidM More than 1 year ago
John, If everyone took your advice you would no longer have this great game to enjoy. We can also do without your preaching.
william More than 1 year ago
The Jockey cost Verrazano dearly by winning by 10. Why win by ten when you can win by 2 and save the horse. Had Verrazano won by 2 then the Travers by 2 then he would've won the Classic where he could 've let his hair out. Stupid jockey.
WILL More than 1 year ago
IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT YOUR DANGEROUS!
Joe Rockhold More than 1 year ago
Awful post.
sharjil More than 1 year ago
I actually love your post. Funniest post ive read in days........ +1
Mark Scheider More than 1 year ago
You are not paying attention to what really matters..... The horse is CRUSHING fields without URGInG. Hand rides to 10 length leads. Nothing about his speed is compromised. His highest cruising speed is still unknown.
Mark Scheider More than 1 year ago
If you wanted a logical argument, you could have said " I want to see this horse duel it out in the last 500 yards of a race and see if he's for real".
Mark Scheider More than 1 year ago
Something 90 percent of you do not have a clue about... Verrazano has turned in a 5 in nearly every race of his career except for his career best 3 and his Derby flop. His Haskell will probably match his career best. Some of the best horses in the history of the sport comparable to this horses talent have at some point turned in 1's and even 0's. Verrazanos best efforts are yet to come. Your analysis is not supported by anything but your opinion. I just gave you stone cold tendencies of the animal. Is he that animal? I guess we will see.