08/28/2012 3:31PM

Saratoga: Highly touted Archwarrior set for debut

Barbara D. Livingston
Archwarrior will make his first start Thursday at Saratoga.

Through the first 34 days of the meet, trainer Todd Pletcher has won 20 races for 2-year-olds, 19 maiden events and the Grade 2 Adirondack with Kauai Katie.

Supposedly, the best one hasn’t run yet.

Thursday, Pletcher takes the wraps off Archwarrior, who debuts in a six-furlong race that goes as the third on an 11-race card. Archwarrior, a son of Arch, brought $375,000 at the OBS 2-year-old in training auction in March. He was entered to run Aug. 11, but scratched when the track came up sloppy. He was entered last Saturday, but landed on the also-eligible list and did not get to run.

He was one of nine horses to enter Thursday’s race, but at least two will scratch. Pletcher also entered Tizracer “as an insurance policy” with John Velazquez named on both. Trainer Bruce Levine named Ramon Dominguez on both Buddy’s Tiz and Buddy’s Smart. When the same rider is named on two horses at NYRA tracks, one must scratch.

[Complete coverage of racing at Saratoga: News, PPs, and video]

“We’re happy to get him in,” Pletcher said. “Hopefully, he runs as well as he has trained. As with any first-time starter, they still have to go over there and prove it in the afternoon.”

Archwarrior has been a terror in the morning, working with 2-year-olds and older horses and more than holding his own.

“He’s been very straightforward,” Pletcher said. “For a big horse bred to go a route of ground, he’s got tactical speed. He’s done some things in the morning you don’t normally see 2-year-olds do.”

Kyri Freeman More than 1 year ago
Here is some information about 2YO racing and soundness: http://www.jockeyclub.com/roundtable_08.asp?section=11 Particularly, when Dr. Bramlage says: "Charge number one: The training and racing of 2-year-old Thoroughbreds is predisposing these horses to accelerated rates of injury and prematurely shortened careers. This charge is leveled by some people in and out of the horse industry, especially people outside of racing. It is a very popular theme with animal welfare organizations that are ill informed on the topic of racing and the horse; it is also parroted frequently in the popular press. To examine these data The Jockey Club Information Systems extracted one-year windows at five-year intervals, using the years 1975 through 2000 as data sets. Horses were divided into the categories "raced as two-year-olds" and "raced, but not as two-year-olds." The data shows a definitive answer to this charge. The first category of data examined was average starts per starter lifetime. The data shows that horses that raced as 2-year-olds raced many more times in their lifetime in each of the years examined when compared to horses that did not race until after their 2-year-old season. Some of these starts were made in the 2-year-old year for the horses that raced at 2, but the difference was more marked than the 2-year-old year alone would account for. Average lifetime earnings per starter for horses that raced as 2-year-olds are almost twice the amount earned by horses that did not race as 2-year-olds. Career average earnings per start for horses that raced as 2-year-olds exceeded average earnings per start for horses that did not race as 2-year-olds in every one of the years from 1975 to 2000 examined. Lastly, the percent stakes winners in horses that raced as 2-year-olds is nearly three times higher than in horses that did not race until their 3-year-old year or later. This data is definitive. It shows that horses that began racing as 2-year-olds are much more successful, have much longer careers, and, by extrapolation, show less predisposition to injury than horses that did not begin racing until their 3-year-old year. It is absolute on all the data sets that the training and racing of 2-year-old Thoroughbreds has no ill effect on the horses' race-career longevity or quality. In fact, the data would indicate that the ability to make at least one start as a 2-year-old has a very strong positive affect on the longevity and success of a racehorse. This strong positive effect on the quality and quantity of performance would make it impossible to argue that these horses that race as 2-year-olds are compromised." I'm more concerned that this colt is by Arch, who I perceive as a stallion who gets fragile horses. Good luck to him.
Kyri Freeman More than 1 year ago
just to be clear, everything in quotes above is Dr. Larry Bramlage. My web search also brought up an article by Avalyn Hunter suggesting some reasons why unsoundness occurs in modern TB bloodlines -- I would recommend people take a look at that.
Kyri Freeman More than 1 year ago
Another link including information on 2YO racing http://www.thoroughbredtimes.com/horse-health/2012/07/17/feeding-for-soundness.aspx now I think I have posted enough links for one day...
Sandy Mason-Tuel More than 1 year ago
@ Christina A- Two yr old racing is not the problem. Over the last 20 yrs. Breeding has taken over the sport. No one wants to risk the future millions the breeding shed brings by risking any injury so they retire these colts when they are 3 and anymore rarely do we see any of them race when they are 4. This lack of longevity is passed on to the next generations resulting in a weakening of the breed. The other part is with the technological advances in MRI's and X Rays a lot of ailments that are detected today were never noticed before so there were probably times when horses weren't 100% sound still ran through their minor injuries-even the trainers of IHA and Rags and even Hansen said they could probably still run but obviously don't want to risk the big Breeding money.
david More than 1 year ago
Excellent post. Racing as 2 year olds is way down the list of problems for race horses. Breeding to "sell" rather than breeding to "race" is probably the number one problem. Matings are selected based on the market value of the resulting foal rather than on soundness or longevity. Until that changes, and it probably never will, race horses will become more and more fragile.
ChristinaA More than 1 year ago
How can you say 2 year old racing isn't a problem? 2 year olds aren't even fully developed yet, they shouldn't be racing until at least their 3 year old season. Breeding is a big issue, people have seriously screwed up Thoroughbreds via breeding, but racing them at a young age definitely doesn't help matters.
david More than 1 year ago
I am afraid the facts don't substantiate your argument. Are you saying 3 year olds are " fully developed"? Or do you mean it is acceptable to race 3 year olds because they are "more developed" ? Obviously, like people, some horses develop early and some don't. Some are fully capable of racing at 2 and some are not. That decision should be made by a competent trainer. If sound race horses were bred to sound race horses then the problem of unsoundness wouldn't be near as rampant as it is now. To say that all horses are not developed enough to race at 2 is simply not true. Racing unsound horses at 2, now that's a problem just as it is at 3,4 or any other age.
[removed] More than 1 year ago
This comment has been deleted
Michael Castellano More than 1 year ago
Maybe it's a bit before your time, but many great horses didn't race in the triple crown races, including Kelso and Dr. Fager, two of the greatest all -time horses. 2 year old racing should be banned, the horses are not fully developed and don't reach their peak until 4, sometimes 5.
John Piassek More than 1 year ago
Horses have raced at 2 since the beginning of time and they never had problems. No need to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
ChristinaA More than 1 year ago
Two year-olds need to stop being raced. The wear-and-tear on their limbs puts their lives at risk in future racing years. A prime example is this year: first I'll Have Another goes, then Union Rags, then Bodemeister, then Hansen, all because of leg issues. The hardy horses like Curlin and Zenyatta didn't run until they were 3 or 4 years old. Thoroughbreds these days aren't bred to be hardy, they're bred to race maybe 6 times in their entire careers and they're bred for speed, not durability. There's something wrong about that.
Richard Land More than 1 year ago
Christina: Please look at the two year old race records of Secretariat and Spectacular Bid. Spectacular Bid raced frequently as a 2YO, had a grueling series of Derby preps as a 3YO and then had a 4YO season which was as good as any horse has ever had.
ChristinaA More than 1 year ago
Richard: Please re-read my comment. I said that Thoroughbred are NO LONGER bred for durability, so they should stop being run so young. Secretariat and Spectacular Bid ran in the '70s and '80s, back when horses were still bred to go long and race for multiple years
John Howland More than 1 year ago
I don't think Bodemeister raced as a 2 year old.What's you're theory on that one?
ChristinaA More than 1 year ago
My theory is that he still wasn't bred to go long, he was bred for speed. His legs couldn't take all the wear-and-tear. He was very fast and very spectacular up to 1 1/8 miles, but he couldn't hold on past that.
Two400 More than 1 year ago
His sire is Empire Maker and you're saying he wasn't bred to go long?
ChristinaA More than 1 year ago
I'm saying that very few stallions nowadays are fit to breed durable horses, therefore their offspring are fragile. There are many issues here that all result in today's horses being crappy stock.
mikey More than 1 year ago
Not only racing at 2 how about not breeding until 5 or 6.The horse's of today are like glass.
DrSmoke120 More than 1 year ago
You are right about how they are bred today. Porcelain limbed and you can't tell me the breed is better as a trade off. Historically to be successful in the 3yo classics you needed to have a good 2 yo season under you to build a base if nothing else. What you have now is what you note, fragile limbed horses, with owners who lust after the classics more than ever. As a result you have trainers walking these colts up to the classics and hoping they don't blow apart, which you have witnessed this year.
armen More than 1 year ago
Here's a little secret: Arch: sire of Blame: sire of I'll Have Another's mother. I wish I were a breeder. I would have been going to Arch for awhile now.
robert More than 1 year ago
Sure he's a nice sire, but you can find those kinds of examples for all major sires, since their books are so large.
stevejPS More than 1 year ago
He'll be retired inside nine months
KeenelandCapper More than 1 year ago
100% right
david scheff More than 1 year ago
i agree, especially the way Pletcher handles his horses. He almost never makes the most out of all the talented, high priced ones he gets, despite shooting them up with God knows what? It would be nice to see more good horses trained by real horsemen like Mott, Motion, or Jones. Pletcher's just turns a profit, then moves on.
Mike More than 1 year ago
100% wrong
mikey More than 1 year ago
The 20 or so babies to win maybe 5 will see their 3 year old race's.What is his % with older horse's at the spa.
robert More than 1 year ago
I generally associate sire Arch with turf progeny, but even more so with distance runners. Still, Todd says the colt has been training out of the box during the mornings, so he must feel confident. Will be interesting to see how he fares, but if he fails, won't be the first highly-touted maiden to not live up to the hype. As the trainer has stated, he has to "prove it in the afternoon". Don't recognize the owners among Pletcher's more familiar clients, but then, he has so many horses in his care these days, who can keep up?
ddwage62 More than 1 year ago
Arch"s greatest progeny this far is blame, who did all his work on the dirt. Arch is very versatile, also Rothko, G1 placed sprinting...
KeenelandCapper More than 1 year ago
pine island?
John Howland More than 1 year ago
ArchArchArch did all his work on dirt.