- DRF Bets
- Handicapping & PPsHorsemen's ProductsReports
Access past performances
- The Wizard
- DRF Gameplan
- Quick Sheets
- DRF Picks
- Today's Racing Digest
- Key Race Report
- Positive ROI Report
- Moss Pace Figure Reports
- Debut Reports
- WE Handicapping Report
- Clocker Reports
Racing and Wagering InformationTools
- DRF EasyForm PPs
- DRF Classic PDF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF HarnessEye PPs
- DRF Daily Harness Program PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
- NewsCategoriesTrack Notes
- StorePast PerformancesHarness PPsPackagesDRF PlusREPORTSPICKS
Kentucky Horse Racing Commission moves to reduce Lasix mishaps
By Matt Hegarty
The veterinary division of the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission has implemented several new procedures in the hopes of avoiding more mistakes with a program requiring that state employees administer the anti-bleeding medication furosemide to horses on race days, commission officials said Wednesday.
The new procedures include a handful of moves designed to improve communication among officials delivering the shots and the program’s administrators, including the standardization of procedures to ensure that the right horses are located and treated. In addition, officials involved in the program will be confronted with a series of “stops” when determining whether to administer furosemide to a horse, according to the commission’s deputy executive director, Marc Guilfoil, as a way to reinforce caution among the three veterinarians that are currently administering the shots.
Since the state racing commission took over the responsibility for delivering raceday shots, veterinarians involved in the program have committed four errors. In two cases, the same horse received two furosemide shots, requiring the horses to be scratched. In another case, a horse who was not supposed to receive furosemide did. In another, a horse who was supposed to receive the drug did not.
Furosemide, which also is known as Lasix or Salix, is legal to administer in every racing jurisdiction in the United States as a way to treat bleeding in the lungs. Kentucky’s regulations require the drug to be administered four hours before a race, give or take 15 minutes.
The commission formed a committee to study the procedures after the four errors were committed in the first five weeks of the program.
Alan Leavitt, who represents the Kentucky Standardbred industry on the commission, asked after the committee gave its presentation why Thoroughbred trainers are not required to bring their horses to a specific location on the racetrack to receive the administrations, rather than being visited by state vets in their stalls. He said Standardbred tracks that restrict furosemide administration routinely require trainers to be responsible for delivering the horse to state vets at the right time.
“It’s works perfectly,” he said. “I’m just curious why it’s not being done that way.”
Said John Ward, the executive director of the commission, “The Thoroughbred method . . . is a lot more accommodating to the Thoroughbred trainers and owners. This is a trade-off we have to accept. It’s the extra mile that we are trying to go to accommodate the owners and trainers.”
A horse is a horse of course of course, as the old saying goes. But a racing thoroughbred is a totally different animal than its Standardbred counterpart. How many thoroughbreds could you lead into the paddock by the halter , dragging harness and a sulky in the other hand.? Or stand in cross ties for hours in the paddock before the race ?So please, let's not even go there. Really it should be pretty simple to put protocols in place where the shots are given correctly and only once.all the years I ran horses at different tracks, getting their lasix was never a problem, the name got checked off the vets list for the day, and a ticket put on the stall door.
There's no reason to line up horses on race day at some clinic just to receive lasix. That is obsurd. The track has stall registration procedures. Harness ship in race day I believe. To disrupt a horses pre race routine on race day is NOT necessary. They are wound up animals not your grandma's standardbred. Four errors out of thousands of shots is not a bad test sample. More errors occur with private vets in unassisted barns.
Duh, do you think?
- 1.Posted 12/10/2013 02:23PM
- 2.Posted 12/09/2013 01:54PM
- 3.Posted 12/10/2013 02:25PM
- 4.Posted 12/10/2013 01:46PM
- 5.Posted 12/10/2013 01:42PM