- Home
- DRF Bets
- Handicapping & PPsHorsemen's ProductsReports
- The Wizard
- DRF Gameplan
- Quick Sheets
- DRF Picks
- Today's Racing Digest
- Key Race Report
- Positive ROI Report
- Moss Pace Figure Reports
- Debut Reports
- BreezeFigs
Access past performances- DRF EasyForm PPs
- DRF Classic PDF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF HarnessEye PPs
- DRF Daily Harness Program PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
Racing and Wagering InformationToolsHorse Racing Links- Race Tracks
- Casinos
- Account Wagering
- Breeding
- Racing and Charitable
- Contests/Games
- Regional/Free
- Radio Shows
Get the most out of
DRF's online PPs with
Learn more. - Entries
- Results
- NewsCategoriesTrack ReportsTriple Crown Special Events
Exclusive content available only with a DRF Plus Plan. See Plan Pricing. - Blogs
- Video
- Learn
- StorePast Performances
- Compare all DRF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF Classic PPs
- DRF EasyForm PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
- See all Pricing/Plans
REPORTS PICKS Harness PPs - Events
- Breeding
Email
A Kentucky legislative committee passed a bill on Tuesday that would place a 0.5 percent tax on bets placed by Kentucky residents through account-wagering operations.
The House Appropriations and Revenue Committee passed the bill unanimously. A nearly identical bill has passed out of the full House on two occasions in the past three years, but it had not been taken up by the Senate in either year.
The effort to enact the tax is being supported by some horsemen and racing officials who have noted that wagers placed by Kentucky residents through wagering accounts are not subject to the same tax treatment as an ontrack bet. Bets placed through accounts also do not return as much revenue to horsemen and tracks as those placed ontrack.
Under the bill, 85 percent of the money raised by the tax would go to Kentucky racetracks and horsemen. Supporters estimate that the tax will raise $400,000 a year.
How does a private industry go to a state assembly and ask for a tax that supports them? I've read elsewhere this may go nowhere. Tracks and Breeding concerns should get their money from the take on all bets, ontrack or off. They need more, change the take and rewrite their deals with ADW's and simulcast outlets.
How in heck does private business request a TAX to support them? Can't ask that enough.
|
Message to the Horsemen and Racing officials if your not getting enough split, change it with each ADW. Not your decliing customer base. That covers the 85% going to you from this tax. Well according to the article.
Now where is the other 15% going? State Pensions????
|
![]() |
screw the horseplayer again. thank you internet for off-shore betting.
did the d.r.f. editors know that take-out at u.s tracks is at an all time high.
you can thank 10 cent supers and 50 cent pick 4's. you will counter with 15 % pick 5 , but overall, we get screwed . exchange betting is the only thing that can save horse racing.
wake up and support it.
|
Best Bets
GHOSTLY APPEAL has been on the sidelines for more than nine months. She'll be hard to deny on the drop from $12,500 N2L to $5,000 N2L if she's ready to roll in her return. WINTER ROCKET made up ground late, but still finished in the rear-half of the pack when she was overmatched against Louisiana-bred $12,500 N2L's in her return from a freshening. She'll be a factor in the exotics on the class drop to open $5,000 N2L. SHE'S BONAFIDE didn't show as much early speed as usual, then rallied to challenge for the lead.
Most Popular
- 1.Posted 05/23/2013 08:40AM
- 2.Posted 05/22/2013 05:35PM
- 3.Posted 05/22/2013 02:08PM
- 4.Posted 05/22/2013 03:18PM
- 5.Posted 05/23/2013 11:31AM



