10/10/2012 3:11PM

Jerardi: Leatherbury's numbers, longevity merit place in Hall of Fame

Barbara D. Livingston
Trainer King T. Leatherbury ranks third all time in wins.

Imagine this training life. Began in 1959. Had 100 or more winners for 26 consecutive years, from 1972 to 1997. Won 1,303 races during his best four years (1975-1978) while never winning fewer than 300 in any of those years. Has 6,350 career winners, third all time.

The man just 66 winners in front of him has 5,000 more starters. Unlike the men who surround him on the winners list (Jack Van Berg and Steve Asmussen), King T. Leatherbury has never had divisions of horses on multiple circuits. He began in Maryland and stayed in Maryland, with summer junkets to Delaware Park when that was essentially a part of the Maryland circuit.

Van Berg is in the Hall of Fame as he should be. Asmussen will get into the Hall of Fame as he should. Leatherbury never even gets a serious Hall of Fame mention.

Time to take a long look at The King. And what better time than now when he is training the best horse of his life at the age of 79.

I was at Laurel Park last Saturday when Ben’s Cat became only the fourth horse to win a Maryland Million race for the third time, joining Hall of Famer Safely Kept among others. It was Leatherbury’s record 10th Maryland Million win. I was at Parx Racing on Sept. 3 when Ben’s Cat, looking hopelessly beaten on a course soaked with heavy rains, ran down front-runner Great Mills and Breeders’ Cup Turf Sprint winner Chamberlain Bridge to win the Turf Monster for the second consecutive year and give Leatherbury his first $1 million horse.

Maybe, that’s it. This was King’s first $1 million horse. But that really misses the point.

Halls of Fame should be about consistency and longevity. They should be about what you do with what you have. They should not about the elitism that is still far too prevalent in this sport.

No, Leatherbury has never been a factor in the Triple Crown. Even his major stakes winners are names few would recognize. The big races are certainly a huge part of the sport, but the day-to-day action also matters. That is Leatherbury’s realm and few have done it better.

No way to know this, but Leatherbury figures he may have claimed more horses than anybody in history. Now, here he is with a horse that he was not sure would ever make the races. Ben’s Cat had a broken pelvis and did not make his debut until May of his 4-year-old season. Naturally, King put him in for $20,000. Dorothy’s Diamond was favored that day at 1-2. Ben’s Cat was 9-2. The pair dueled around the track before Ben’s Cat got away late. King, who has been known to bet, probably liked the price.

Dorothy’s Diamond did not win his next race, but, away from Ben’s Cat, won the two after that by a combined 19 1/4 lengths. Ben’s Cat? He won his next seven, but King had to put him back in for a claiming price in that second start, winning a nonwinners-of-two lifetime for $25,000.

Since then, Ben’s Cat has won 13 stakes and $1.2 million. He is 11 for 16 on grass and 7 for 11 on dirt. A turf sprint specialist the last two years, Ben’s Cat just wins. He does not do second or third. He has those 18 wins, 2 seconds, and 1 third.

The Turf Monster was a Breeders’ Cup Win and You’re In race, but Ben’s Cat is a by a $2,000 sire out of one of Leatherbury’s mares. The now 6-year-old is not Breeders’ Cup nominated. It would cost $100,000 to supplement to the BC Turf Sprint. The King owns the horse as well as trains him. So, he could take some of that $1.2 million and head for Santa Anita.

Leatherbury, however, is a businessman who revolutionized the claiming business the way D. Wayne Lukas revolutionized the stakes business. He makes business decisions, not emotional decisions. He said he is not likely to put up the $100,000 to run Ben’s Cat down the hill.

Perhaps if he did put up the paper and Ben’s Cat got the money, everybody would notice what Leatherbury has done. Really, that should not be necessary. He has already done quite enough.

No, he has never spent as much time at the barn as some other trainers, preferring to manage the stable, but not micromanage it. He is not a horse whisperer, but how many are there really beyond Allen Jerkens and Charlie Whittingham. The trainer as knower of all things has always been kind of fraud perpetrated through the years by those who would rather deal in myth than reality.

Leatherbury does not nominate any of his horses to the Breeders’ Cup because, he told me after the Turf Monster, “the kind of horses I breed, what chance have I got to have one of the best horses in the country. It didn’t make sense to do.”

It did not. It does not. Neither, of course, does Ben’s Cat, King’s horse of a lifetime in a lifetime of horses.

So, what about the Hall of Fame, King?

“It doesn’t bother me,” Leatherbury said. “I’ve had my 15 minutes a million times.”

Still, it is past time to give King T. Leatherbury a few minutes to speak in Saratoga Springs one summer. And a plaque that would explain just what he has done and how long he has done it.

Simon Wainwright More than 1 year ago
I agree. The man is phenomenal as a leader. I worked for him, and he always did good by his grooms and hotwalkers. He ran a smooth stable and oh yes winning was the name of the game. This man is a trainer's trainer, not only capable of training horses, but he trained me to walk horses and to groom them. You are right the Hall of Fame should be more about the sport than money.
DonD More than 1 year ago
Hypothetically , if King T. did not owe Bens Cat and just trained him, I wonder if he would he pressure the owners to run him in the Breeders Cup and if so, how hard? In my opinion, a Hall of Fame trainer would not hesitate to nominate Bens Cat if it was financially possible. It certainly appears to be possible considering the earnings of Bens Cat. Their are many reason he should run in the BC and only one reason he should not. Money!!!!
John Murphy More than 1 year ago
I remember going to Sports Palace at Laurel Park the second day it was open. It was the most fantastic venue I had ever seen. We got a table. ordered lunch and marveled at the giant TV's, which were made in Belgium? and considered to be the best in the world at the time. I also remember that King and a couple of buddies were at the table next to us. He never left SP, though he had several horses running that day. One of his horses won the second half of the double triple, which was a new bet at the time. I'm even thinking the bet started the same day SP opened, though I'm not positive of that. As the horses crossed the line, King and his entourage exploded with excitement, whooping and hollaring. They obviously had the only ticket, and it paid around $50K. I felt like an outsider, playing against insiders. Yes he does bet.
Tom More than 1 year ago
I know him well, he should part with the $100,000.00 and run the horse. The man & the horse are both millionaires.
Bill Glavin More than 1 year ago
Well done Dick! Couldn't have it said it better.
Bill Glavin More than 1 year ago
Well said Dick!
Jon Cohen More than 1 year ago
Jerardi, At least now you are writing about a worthy candidate for the Hall Of Fame, unlike your idol Carlos Guerrero and his magic ice machine.
Oscar Wells More than 1 year ago
my dad was one of the best jockeys out there in the late 40's to the early 60's he will never see the hall of fame but he did get his picture in the kentucky derby museum and a book coming out with him and 30 other jockeys from the bush tracks of oklahoma and kansas charlie burr ,eldon nelson,and more called boys from the bushes by Lou Dean my dad like the little apple aksarben and many more he even taught Steve Asmussen dad kieth how to be a jockey at Park Jefferson tri city south dakota in the 50's
Clovis Crane More than 1 year ago
Agreed. King Should be in the HOF. I'd like to point out that the HOF is biased to BIG race winners and negates the fact; It is very hard to win any race. So, I feel the biggest travesty the HOF is responcible for is not putting the menn who have won the most races of all time in the Hall. You can start off at the top--Dale Baird. Dale wasn't a man of glamorous races but he was a professional horseman who won more races than anyone. Dale won more races than any jockey, owner, or trainer. Not to mention he did it all while on his own coin earned from the horses not another business. I will always consider the HOF a sham until the greatest of our sport; King and Baird are honored.
Gibson Thoroughbred Farm More than 1 year ago
I agree, 110% correct!!!
Rick Buckley More than 1 year ago
Based off of their body of work, horsemanship and who is or has been a great embassador of the sport! Who is more deserving that is not already in the HOF?