03/31/2014 12:00PM

Jay Bergman: Driver Jim Morrill Jr. banished from Pocono Downs

Email
Mike Lizzi
Jim Morrill, Jr. shown winning a NYSS event at Yonkers Raceway.

If you’ve got talent, the U.S.A. is the place to be. Perhaps no country on the planet is as forgiving to those individuals who run afoul of the law yet get chance upon chance to redeem themselves.

You pick the sport and there’s a long list of those in trouble with the law that have gone from team to team, but never out of the league. Owners have a penchant for winning and for some there is no cost or limit they will go to achieve such goals.

It may have come as a surprise to some, but when the news was publicized earlier this week that Jim Morrill Jr. had been banned at Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs, it was hardly a shock.

HarnessRacingUpdate.com accepted a one-sided story from the driver himself without so much as reflecting on Morrill’s standing at other notable tracks in the metropolitan area.

You see, Pocono is not the first track in the area to ban Morrill from competing on a regular basis. Morrill is unwelcome for all overnight races at Yonkers Raceway and has been so for at least the last five years.

[DRF HARNESS: LIKE us on Facebook and get timely updates on the latest harness news]

Morrill for the moment will set up shop at the Meadowlands on weekends and most definitely will be in demand when the New York Sire Stakes season begins in a couple of months. There’s little question as to Morrill’s on-track ability and the HRU story credited him with winning at a better than a 20 percent ratio at Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs.

Yet those who read statistics don’t always get the facts straight. Sometimes decisions are made that have nothing to do with winning percentages and perhaps more to do with losing percentages. Sometimes even the most successful drivers can put forth puzzling efforts that don’t allow them to win races.

Is it fair to say that a driver of Morrill’s talent could and should win at an even higher percentage given the incredible choice of talented horses he has driven and the astute knowledge of how to drive and win races?

Getting back to Yonkers, even without a direct explanation as to why they have banned Morrill, isn’t it fair to say that his banishment for an extended period of time must have a deep-rooted reason? While the track has done most of its banning under the radar and obviously as a private facility it does not need to explain itself, couldn’t one conclude that some of Jim Morrill Jr.’s activities in Westchester County didn’t sit well with management?

Now, suddenly to some, a second racetrack in close proximity has made a similar call.

In the HRU article, Morrill claimed that he hadn’t been given an explanation and essentially had no idea why he had been banned.

So if he did know why he was banned, does anyone think Jim Morrill Jr. would want to talk publicly about it?

“I like driving there and I give 150% every time I am out on the track,” Morrill said in the HRU story. I’m not sure what scale Morrill is measuring his effort level on with that statement.

Needless to say, the public is always going to be puzzled when racetrack management banishes trainers and drivers. With Pocono’s latest action, confused racing fans now have to wonder why trainer Rene Allard’s horses are allowed to race at Yonkers and Pocono on a regular basis but not at the Meadowlands. At the same time, those looking in the track programs at Pocono and Yonkers won’t find the name Jim Morrill Jr. driving any overnight events but he’ll be a regular at the Meadowlands on weekends.

The question of course is why the Meadowlands has welcomed Jim Morrill with open arms when other tracks find him distasteful? Is it because of the absence of top drivers Yannick Gingras and Tim Tetrick, or simply lack of concrete evidence against the driver?

From an ability standpoint, Morrill is up there with any currently racing at the Meadowlands. From a gambling standpoint, those wagering on his horses should get a live steer each and every race.  Yet I had trouble figuring out why in the final race this past Saturday night he didn’t sit chilly in third on the rail with On The Radar and decided to come out and be forced wide around stalled cover on the final turn. The Morrill I’ve watched over the years has always been a master of position and timing and this move, considering he’d gotten a three hole from post 10, added unnecessary extra distance to the horse’s trip and may have impacted his chances to finish in the money.

Personally I don’t know what the officials at Yonkers Raceway or Pocono Downs have concluded in the matter of excluding Jim Morrill Jr. from their racetracks. What I do believe, at least in the case of the latter track, is that they had an entire off season to perhaps look at all of the activities that Morrill was involved in both on and off the track and must have concluded from their findings that his presence would not be in their best interest in 2014.

But the good news for Morrill and fans that enjoy betting on him is that there are still many other tracks out there where he’ll be readily accepted. Even Yonkers will be glad to open its doors for him during stakes season when all drivers are welcome. With his enormous talent and list of accomplishments in the sport, it’s unlikely that Morrill won’t be able to get enough drives to qualify for his pension, as he related in the HRU story.

Whether we accept the HRU story as accurate or not matters little in the final analysis. What facts we do know say that a single driver is not allowed to race at two tracks while openly invited in to another.

Draw your own conclusions.

[UPDATE: An official from Mohegan Sun Pocono confirmed on Wednesday (4/2) that Morrill will be allowed to return to the track on May 1. No reason was given for his absence.]

[DRF HARNESS: Check out our NEW and IMPROVED Harness Eye PPs and see our discount packages]

Rick Fletcher More than 1 year ago
What about his days in Monticello he was a thief then!!
Jack H More than 1 year ago
Jay your article really irritates me !! Morrill has done nothing wrong that has been exposed or proven and you come out of DRF and slander him. He should sue your A_ _ !! That is why every track should be forced to give a public explanation for an banishment. The fact that the update states he is welcomed back on may 2nd now support your article as a witchhunt jump to conclusion POS
Bob Zanakis More than 1 year ago
The problem I see is that Pokie (Mohegan Sun at Pocono Downs) is they accept people that have been caught using drugs that are not permitted in the time frame of the race where entered (all documented in vets bills and records) but who gets off on a technicality where the judge failed to render his decision in a timely manner. The evidence is in, Pocono accepts cheaters. It is no wonder tracks like Pocono Downs have nicknames. In this instance, Pokie is commonly referred to as "Needle Downs" by many fans in this sport of harness racing. The hypocrisy of management of Mohegan Sun leads me to believe that there are other cheats within their control and I would try to avoid betting there myself.
Jeff Biever More than 1 year ago
Morrill is, as stated, a highly talented driver, and has been so for many years. He does have severe blemishes on his record, including shenanigans at Freehold several decades ago, and driving several races under the influence at The Red Mile, which pushed him into rehab. I will assume that Pocono has uncovered information which has led to the ban. What amazes me, however, is that Pocono continues to accept many trainers who are unwelcome elsewhere. I appreciate your reporting, Jay.
The Big B More than 1 year ago
Something seriously wrong with the system and protecting the betting public if this driver has been banned from multiple area tracks, under assumption it was justified, but just zips over to nearby Meadowlands and gets pick of horses in almost every race? This shouldn't be.
Ken Wiener More than 1 year ago
Although I don't follow harness racing, thank you for this brave article. What is shocking is that these racetracks, while trying to do the right thing, do not provide any explanations to their customers, the betting public.
Jeff Mcintosh More than 1 year ago
OH DO NOT FORGET FREEHOLD.IF YOU DONT KNOW ABOUT THIS ONE JUST ASK PARKER, BRENNAN OR THE CHAUFFER
Chris James More than 1 year ago
Mr. Bergman, You seem more interested in countering the HRU story than reporting on the issue.
Jay Bergman More than 1 year ago
HRU story was incomplete. Including Yonkers banishment of Morrill and the fact that he's welcome at Meadowlands is story not covered elsewhere.
Damian Csakai More than 1 year ago
But the article was about his banishment at Pocono, not Yonkers.
Cyclops More than 1 year ago
"Yet I had trouble figuring out why in the final race this past Saturday night he didn’t sit chilly in third on the rail with On The Radar and decided to come out and be forced wide around stalled cover on the final turn." I just watched it on youtube. He drives to win. If he would have sat on the rail he would have choked the horse and gotten locked in. It was obvious to me that he had no horse. He was kicking the horse and trying hard. It was also pouring hard out which is not conducive to re-gearing a horse back up in the stretch. In my eyes it was a beautiful drive. He left the gate, got a nice tuck and I loved that he didn't give the 9 horse a hole like some other drivers would have done. I wish I knew why they banned him. Pocono Downs won't be seeing any of my money now that he's gone. Their pools are too small and takeout too high anyway.
Jay Bergman More than 1 year ago
So you're saying with certainty that he would have choked the horse and gotten locked in. In the same breath you are saying he had no horse and he was trying to win. So waiting for the 100-1 shot to stop on the outside and then moving would have hurt his chances of winning in some way? Make as many excuses as you care to 99 of 100 top drivers would have waited.
Cyclops More than 1 year ago
Thats why he's a winner he doesn't sit in like the other bums.
Matt Zebriski More than 1 year ago
I know less about this story now than I did before I read it....what the hell are you talking about Jay?
Jay Bergman More than 1 year ago
Matt, The story is how tracks are banning individuals on their own with no reasons being offered. The conflict is that all expect us to believe they are ridding the earth of "bad" individuals. Yet somehow the Meadowlands finds certain guys o.k. and other guys "bad." While Yonkers and Pocono find this driver unacceptable, he's welcome at the Meadowlands.
Damian Csakai More than 1 year ago
Seemed like a round about way of expressing that point. I do agree though, and all tracks should be on the same standard. Some sort of commission is in need.