- DRF Bets
- Handicapping & PPsHorsemen's ProductsReports
Access past performances
- The Wizard
- DRF Gameplan
- Quick Sheets
- DRF Picks
- Today's Racing Digest
- Key Race Report
- Positive ROI Report
- Moss Pace Figure Reports
- Debut Reports
- Clocker Reports
Racing and Wagering Information
- DRF EasyForm PPs
- DRF Classic PDF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF HarnessEye PPs
- DRF Daily Harness Program PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
- Expanded Closer Looks
- NewsCategoriesTrack Notes
- StorePast Performances
- Compare all DRF PPs
- DRF Formulator PPs
- DRF Classic PPs
- DRF EasyForm PPs
- Daily Racing Program PPs
- Expanded Closer Looks
Crist: Home-brewed stats skew Times analysis
By Steven Crist
“Mangled Horses, Maimed Jockeys,” a 6,400-word article splashed across the front-page of last Sunday’s New York Times, might have been a fair and useful piece of investigative journalism had it stuck to its scope: Rates of equine injuries and fatalities at some tracks, particularly Quarter Horse venues in the Southwest, are alarmingly high. There also are legitimate questions about the quality of oversight and regulation in an era when some of these tracks are operated by casino companies whose primary interest in racing is to secure licenses for their slot-machine operations.
The article, however, went well beyond that, generalizing about an entire industry with broad and unsupported strokes. Much worse, the paper then published a self-congratulatory editorial two days later, titling it “Horses to the Slaughter” and calling racing a “disreputable” industry whose participants have little regard for the welfare of its horses and riders. The editorial, written with the teary outrage of an 8-year-old who has just learned that ponies don’t live forever, states that the “real pillars” of racing are “the casual and continued mistreatment of vulnerable, overmedicated and ultimately disposable athletes.”
Much of the Times’s overreaching conclusions stem from a proprietary analysis of supposed breakdowns, based on a computer analysis of comments in results charts. I knew something had gone badly awry with its analysis when I saw that Saratoga Race Course – by all previous measures one of the safest tracks in the world – had clocked in with 5.6 breakdown “incidents” per 1,000 starts over the last three years, above the national average in its survey.
Jeff Scott, a knowledgeable racing writer for the track’s hometown paper, The Saratogian, manually went through the same results charts for the last three years, and counted only 25 such incidents compared to theTimes’s 53. He theorized that The Times had included horses leaving the course in steeplechase races but The Times on Thursday denied including such cases.
The Times resorted to brewing its own statistics because of the lack of reliable historical data. Racing indeed has until recently been negligent in keeping such records. Yet a discrepancy of this magnitude regarding the premier race meet in American racing calls the accuracy of the entire analytical undertaking into question.
Even if these rates were correct, they exist in a vacuum without a comparison point to 5, 10 or 20 years ago. Nobody knows if the situation is the same, better or worse than at any other time in history, but that is an inconvenient fact in the broader narrative The Times has been trying to tell for almost a decade now: that the sport is barbaric and its participants are crooked and uncaring.
Facts to the contrary, the paper’s coverage has consistently suggested that the deaths of Barbaro and Eight Belles were the result of a culture of drugs and neglect rather than regrettable but unpreventable accidents; that Big Brown lost the Triple Crown because of steroid usage rather than a common hoof problem that came at an inopportune time; and that the federal government must come riding in on its own white horses to save the sport from itself and its incompetent overlords.
Politicians wasted no time jumping on the Times article to attempt to revive their grandstanding calls for federal intervention.
Racing “has reached an alarming level of corruption and exploitation,” thundered Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico, without documenting any actual corruption, much less any efforts he has made to improve the obviously underfunded regulation of racing in the state he represents.
“The doping of injured horses and forcing them to compete is deplorable and must be stopped,” said Rep. Ed Whitfield of Kentucky, who is trying to revive his and Udall’s failed 2008 bill that would put racing under the control of the Food and Drug Administration and ban the use of therapeutic raceday medications. It is unclear at best that either of those steps would improve equine welfare or racing safety.
The racing industry’s official response to the Times article has been disappointingly timid. A statement from the National Thoroughbred Racing Association called it “sobering,” a particularly poor word choice implying that the industry has been drunkenly turning a blind eye to the familiar issues the article addressed. The statement concluded with an odd internal call for all industry participants to “consider all options for enacting nationwide reform in a more comprehensive, lasting way,” which many will read as an invitation to Federal intervention.
Racing should react more swiftly and forcefully to these assaults on its very existence and do a better job of explaining the efforts it is making to improve the sport and take care of its horses. It’s pretty clear that if racing doesn’t stand up for itself, nobody else will.
Can't wait for the teary-eyed NY times to start taking up the plight of the cows. I'll give them 100 bucks for every race horse and they give me $1 for every cow.
these politicians and mainstream media have a lot of nerve talking about corruption. These are such noble professions.
This is how politicians have their pockets lined with more money from the racing industry. The Times is just setting the stage for more grease money. Our corrupt politicians are the beneficiary, because race horsing, as we all know, isn't going anywhere.
as one of the biggest fans of horseracing for over 30 years,i unfortunetly have seen enough,enough of the cheating by jockeys,enough of the dopping by trainers,enough of the industry turning a blind eye to all the infractions,you can dispute the times articles statistics,but they are dead right when they say that corruption ,exessive greed and exploitaxion are the norm,all the racing industry does is excuse the cheating and make excuses for its complete lack of oversight,the whole industry should be regulated and watched by law enforcement,its like a mafia enterprise right now.
As Woody Stephens (a hall of fame trainer) once said "This is not a game for people in short pants". donot know why everybody has to be so poliitically correct anymore. everything has to be a sensation - tragedy is bad just get over it like everbody else does.
ATTENTION ALL THOSE WHO WORK IN THE RACING INDUSTRY! Bend forward . . . .a little more . . . . you're almost there . . . .STICK HEAD IN SAND!
It's really easy to kill the messenger here, and the NY Times played loose with the facts, but when you have pictures of dead two year old horses discarded in a dump we have a problem. Horse racing is now behind the power curve of public opinion and we seem to be helpless in stopping these bad actors from ruining the sport. One more high profile breakdown - in the Derby or Breeders' Cup and we will be under full attack. And there is no sense in trying to defend ourselves when Dutrow, Mullins and all of the other amateur chemists continue to ply their trade with impunity. What do we do when we are under attack? We go after the inconsistencies in the article rather than fixing the problems - the problems that all of us know are there. Wait until someone starts doing the math with all of the foals that never race, where do they go? We all know where they go...
Mr Crist, the NYT does not even publish entries much less other Horseracing info They have so many discrepencies That their Motto "All the news fit to print" is spin of the Media and that is all.. UnfortunatelyPeople believe what they read. media
Steve, this is well stated, and much appreciated. In Maryland, we have an even greater discrepency, tha at saratoga. The Times stated that Laurel breakdowns were at 3.5/1000 and Pimlico was 3.8/1000, I have the actual number for the year, and it was 0.96/1000. Granted, we had an exceptionally good year, but on average, we are around 1.5/1000, a far cry from the Times figure.
I had a string of email communication with Walt Bogdanich, and his most damning retort to me: From: Bogdanich, Walt [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:19 PM To: Dana Reis Subject: RE: by-lined article of Walt Bogdanich, Joe Drape, Dara L. Miles, Griffin Parmer Perhaps you should express your opinion to the Jockey Club which includes quarter horses and thoroughbreds in its injury data base. QH and TB are regulated by the same state racing commissions and race under the same rules. Both have riders on their back. Feel free to email me and I will share all of my communication with you. He has no interest in learning anything about horses or statistical truths, and simply wants to have a lame last word. It is a contest as to who is worse, the politicos grandstanding on his set of half truths (although half is a lot to cede), or him. It is a disgrace.
- 1.Posted 10/23/2014 01:41PM
- 2.Posted 10/28/2014 11:00AM
- 3.Posted 10/27/2014 08:04PM
- 4.Posted 10/28/2014 12:23PM
- 5.Posted 10/28/2014 05:09PM