Updated on 07/20/2012 9:33AM

Beyer: What Belmont history can teach Gutierrez

Barbara D. Livingston
Mario Gutierrez (right), with I’ll Have Another’s trainer, Doug O’Neill, has never ridden at Belmont.

When jockey Mario Gutierrez came to Pimlico to ride I’ll Have Another in the Preakness, he knew almost nothing about the race or the track. He had spent most of his career at little Hastings Park in Vancouver. And so he studied.

He went to the press box to watch prior runnings of the race on a video monitor, then returned to his hotel and studied more: “I watched past replays of the Preakness and the horses who were involved in the race. I did my homework.” Once Gutierrez felt properly prepared, he relaxed.

“I try not to put too many pressures on myself,” he said. “Whatever is meant to happen will happen.”

What happened, of course, was a victory that gave I’ll Have Another the chance to become the first Triple Crown winner since 1978. Since Gutierrez never saw Belmont Park before this week, he’ll need to do his homework again. Indeed, he should do it with added diligence, because jockeys’ tactics are more crucial in the Belmont Stakes, which is run at 1 1/2 miles, than in any other American race. Racing fans and historians can readily recount the errors by riders who have cost their mounts the Triple Crown. What is meant to happen doesn’t necessarily happen in the Belmont.

In order to avoid the pitfalls that may await him Saturday, Gutierrez might begin his homework by studying films of four illuminating Belmonts of the past.

1979: This race may have poignancy for Gutierrez, because it marked the last time a jockey with credentials as slim as his rode the favorite in the Belmont Stakes. Ron Franklin, aboard the mighty Spectacular Bid, was sitting second behind an 85-1 shot, Gallant Best, who had torn off to a five-length lead on the backstretch. Just behind him was Angel Cordero Jr., who had done everything possible to intimidate Franklin in the days leading up to the Belmont. Perhaps he wanted to get away from Cordero, perhaps he was overconfident, but Franklin made a horrible decision when he urged Spectacular Bid to duel with Gallant Best, speeding six furlongs in an enervating 1:11.2. (In the prior two years, Affirmed and Seattle Slew had covered the same fraction in 1:14.) This unnecessary exertion took its toll − Bid finished third − and Franklin earned a dubious place in history for losing aboard one of best Thoroughbreds of all time.

2004: Fast-forward 25 years to a Triple Crown bid that evoked memories of Spectacular Bid. The undefeated Smarty Jones was sitting just outside the two leaders, in good stalking position, when another rival moved up outside of him. Jockey Stewart Elliott didn’t want to risk getting caught in traffic, so he hit the gas, accelerated the third quarter in a blistering 23.11 seconds, opened a four-length lead − and was caught at the wire by longshot Birdstone. Like Franklin, Elliott will have this professional epitaph: “He moved too soon.”

1998: Real Quiet had won the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness by making a strong wide move on the final turn to take command and defeat his rival, Victory Gallop. In the Belmont, jockey Kent Desormeaux employed the same tactics − he made a surge on the final turn and opened a four-length lead − but the results were different. He ran out of gas in the long Belmont stretch and Victory Gallop caught him, winning by less than an inch.

2009: Mine That Bird had won the Derby with an electrifying rally, and Calvin Borel tried to duplicate it in the Belmont. After trailing the field early, he launched a last-to-first move on the turn, as track announcer Tom Durkin called: “It’s Mine That Bird with a bold blitz to the lead!” But Borel’s mount couldn’t sustain his momentum through the stretch, and he faded to finish third.

If Gutierrez studies these races, he will absorb the most important lessons about riding the Belmont Stakes: Don’t move too soon. And don’t try to win by making a bold blitz to the lead.

In the first two legs of the Triple Crown, horses often do win by making strong moves on the final turn. Spectacular Bid, Pleasant Colony, Ferdinand, and Real Quiet all did so in the Kentucky Derby, took command a furlong from the finish line, and went on to win the roses. But these horses all lost the Belmont, whose 12-furlong distance makes it a different type of race. The most efficient way to run the Belmont distance is to travel at a relative steady pace − a rule that applies to both front-runners and come-from-behind runners. When Drosselmeyer rallied to win in 2010, he ran his three half-miles in 49.8, 50.8, and 50.8. When Swale led all the way in 1984, his three half miles were 49.4, 49.2, and 49.6.

The aforementioned jockeys who made premature moves had something else in common. Franklin, Elliott, Desormeaux, and Borel were all based outside of New York and had never competed at Belmont Park regularly. Only Desormeaux had ridden in the Belmont Stakes.

Experience counts in the last leg of the Triple Crown. And Gutierrez’s lack of experience − at Belmont, at 1 1/2 miles, and at high-level racing in general − could be an issue Saturday.

But he does bring significant assets into the race. He is thoughtful about his profession. As he demonstrated at Pimlico, he is willing to study and learn. The people in the I’ll Have Another camp say he has always appeared confident, relaxed, and unfazed by pressure. Moreover, the fact that he has done most of his riding in the minor leagues may be a bit misleading. At the six-month Hastings Park season in 2011, Gutierrez won with 30 percent of his mounts throughout the season − an almost unheard-of rate at any level of the game. He was a star in the making.

His biggest asset, of course, is the colt who will be underneath him. Although I’ll Have Another won the Derby and Preakness with strong rallies, he had displayed good early speed in all of his California races. This versatility gives his jockey plenty of strategic options in the Belmont. All he needs to remember − on the biggest day of his life, with 100,000 people in the grandstand cheering and millions watching − is to stay calm and be patient.

© The Washington Post, 2012

MGropenSDREADER More than 1 year ago
As it turns out, Belmont taught Gutierrez nothing that he didn't already know, to wit: Thoroughbred racing is a cruelly quixotic venture--not only for the horse player--but for every biped and equine involved.
Tom Gregory More than 1 year ago
i'm buying the triple crown for ill have another by putting him under rags and dullahan in the exacta and cheering loudly for my bet while hoping i lose it..
Joe Seba More than 1 year ago
I'd love to see I'll Have Another win the Triple Crown, but as far as betting the race goes I'll be looking for a price and Street Life prepped perfectly in the Peter Pan making that big stretch move Andy feels is so important (as do I). Even if he finishes second to IHA the exacta should be decent. I'll be keying both in the tri's and super with the obvious choices and throwing in Antigun for 3rd and 4th looking for a score.
R. Martin More than 1 year ago
One point that ought to be considered is that you do not move up to General from First Lieutenant. Time, experience, feel, judgment; all take many years to acquire. Super Mario (even though a likeable kid) is not seasoned enough (IMO) to outsmart JRV, arguably one of the top 3 jockeys last 5 years. The Belmont Stakes, more than any of the 3 Triple Crown races is won by experience over enthusiasm. Give a huge edge to Union Rags as to rider. Also 4/5 on IHA will be a massive Underlay whereas Union Rags at 9/2 to 5/1 will be a Fair price.
Tom Gregory More than 1 year ago
if you think you're getting 9/2 on rags you're pipedreaming - and iha will go off much higher than 4/5 - around 3/2 - all the wise guys are betting rags.
Tom Gregory More than 1 year ago
and i um using that terrm derogatorially
Grass Is Greener More than 1 year ago
I think about 4-1 is right for Union Rags. Wise guys are betting Dullahan who will be second choice.
chad mc rory More than 1 year ago
Hey Andy, Is Jockey Martinez in town yet?
R. Martin More than 1 year ago
Jockey Mario Fernandez Martinez Gutierrez is motorcycling from CA to NY and is expected momentarily at Belmont.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
I'll Have Another certainly doesn't have much to beat, does he? But take a look at past Belmont runnings before saying "take Dullahan and cash." Belmont winners usually show strategic early speed and then hold off the late-running Dullahan types. I'll have Dullahan in the #2 slot on my exacta and trifecta tickets, but he won't be at the top.
Mark Pordhanm More than 1 year ago
Take Dullahan and cash. I only wish we could do the Belnont/Raay-Noor's double, but sadly that old great fried chicken shack has gone.
Grass Is Greener More than 1 year ago
Dullahan is this year's Ice Box. Check out the story of Ice Box in the 2010 Kentucky Derby and Belmont Stakes, and I am being generous to Dullahan because: - Ice Box had 3 wins on dirt before the Belmont including the G1 Florida Derby. Dullahan had never won on dirt, his best efforts were two 3rd place finishes on dirt. This race is called The Test of a Champion, and no horse had ever won this race without a prior win on dirt and this is the 145th running, a race that is older than the Kentucky Derby. - Ice Box made up 7 lengths on Derby winner in the final furlong. Dullahan only made up 2.25 length in the final furlong. - They both have mediocre pedigree for the 12f distance, but Ice Box's pedigree was actually slightly better. His Distance Tomlinson for 12f was 270 vs. 260 for Dullahan and his Dosage Index was 3.36 vs 4.20 for Dullahan. Historically any horse with Distance Tomlinson less than 280 and/or Dosage over 4.20 is a toss out on the win end unless affected by other factors such as sloppy track etc. Tomlinson and Steve Roman's Dosage Index are not always right, but they are almost never both wrong at the same time. Ice Box promptly ran 8th in the 2010 Belmont Stakes. I can understand taking a shot with Dullahan at 10-1 or more, but he's gonna be second choice at around 7-2 to 5-1. Alternatives: - I'll Have Another, the Derby and Preakness winner is a much better bet as I believe that his post time odds will be closer to 3-2. - if not Union Rags is a much better choice at about 9-2 to 6-1. Union Rags was a G1 winner on this very dirt oval, even tho his Distance Tomlinson of 247 for 12f is even worse than Dullahan's, his Dosage Index is a sterling 2.14 which is the same as I'll Have Another's and the second best Dosage in the field behind Five Sixteen. The way Steve Roman calculated his data Union Rags got a boost from his Raise a Native dam sire line while Dullahan was penalized for the most severe in-breeding with Raise a Native on both the sire and the dam sire lines.
Ron Fox More than 1 year ago
With only 1 horse outside of IHA, Mario will be able to track whats going on and who's doing it. He has rode two very good races, why think he won't on Saturday? This race is for second!
Sam Shelby More than 1 year ago
I think you're 100% on. He's fast, not married to one style, game as can be, solid with Arch and Pleasant Tap in his pedigree. And it's time.
ksharpe01 More than 1 year ago
Good article. It fails to mention that Mario Gutierrez is going to "practice" the 1.5 mile Belmont route by racing in the Brooklyn Handicap (GII) the night before the Stakes. Check out Belmont Race 10 Friday June 8th. Mario will ride Boxeur des Rues (another Reddam Racing/O'Neill). If all goes well Friday night, they'll be #9 @PP 10. IHA & Gutierrez are PP 11 for Saturday's Stakes.
Anonymous More than 1 year ago
Pedigree is king for the Belmont, and so is the Jockey. A mile and a half is an unknown to the horse and rider, so, patience must be the number one asset. Look at previous Belmont's, and see the horse that lost, usually, was the one who moved too soon. IHA, can win this race. Be patient Mario, and smell the roses. This is not the strongest field for the Belmont. After,IHA,Rags,and Dulhan, it is mostly allowance type horses.