05/24/2012 2:09PM

Anti-slaughter policies proving tough to enforce


Where did Canuki and Cactus Cafe go? That question has been occupying racing officials in Ohio and West Virginia since the week before the Kentucky Derby, when a group of anti-slaughter advocates who had arranged foster homes for those two racehorses discovered both effectively disappeared May  1 when trainer and horse hauler Mark Wedig picked them up from Beulah Park’s barn area in Grove City, Ohio. A two-week search for the horses was ultimately successful, but the case highlights how difficult it can be to trace horses once they’ve left racetrack property. And it raises larger questions about racetrack anti-slaughter policies, including whether those in-house rules are enforceable and whether they have helped drive the racehorse slaughter trade underground.

“At least when they were going to the auctions, you could go to Sugarcreek or New Holland or Unadilla and find a Thoroughbred,” said Mary Johnson, a rescue volunteer who helped find foster volunteers for Canuki and Cactus Cafe. “Now these horses just disappear. In a way, the policies have hurt the horses, because now the trainer just hauls the horse off the track, takes the horse to a kill buyer. This happens at every track. More so at the low-level tracks, but it happens at the big tracks, too.”

Anti-slaughter policies became common in 2008, after Eight Belles’s breakdown and an HBO documentary about the racetrack-to-slaughterhouse journey of 4-year-old No Day Off inspired public outcry over racehorse welfare, including widespread condemnation of horse slaughter. Today, numerous tracks have these policies, including those operated by Churchill Downs Incorporated, the Stronach Group, New York Racing Association, and Beulah owner Penn National Gaming, as well as Suffolk Downs and Mountaineer Park, among others. In general, they forbid owners and trainers from directly or indirectly causing a horse to be put to slaughter, and they threaten a range of penalties, including loss of stalls or ejection. It’s difficult to know how common violations are, or how tracks have handled them, partly because there is no central reporting database for tracks’ in-house policy infractions.

“I think the tracks have very good intentions,” said Beulah steward Joe Deluca, who participated in the Canuki/Cactus Cafe investigation. “They don’t want these horses to go to slaughter, and in some cases I think the owners absolutely don’t want these horses to go to slaughter. However, the way it’s structured it’s a policy, how are you going to enforce it? How does a track prove it? If I take a horse out to Farm K over here, leave him there for a day, then someone picks him up and takes him to slaughter, I can say, ‘I didn’t know what was happening to him.’ It’s difficult to follow the trail, because they always pass it off to the next guy.”

Establishing horses’ chain of custody is especially difficult in the private market. The Canuki/Cactus Cafe situation is a case in point. Wedig indicated on Beulah’s exit paperwork that he was taking the horses to an Ohio farm, then later told Deluca they went to West Virginia, where Wedig is a licensed trainer. Beulah officials, unable to determine the horses’ location, took action in early May against both Wedig and the horses’ last owner, trainer Barbara Price, for providing false information and impeding the investigation. Price has been ruled off for a year and fined $1,000; she did not appeal. Wedig, who was not licensed in Ohio this year, has been put on a “stop list,” which requires him to appear in front of the Ohio Racing Commission and answer questions about the case in order to become eligible for a racing license in the state.

Neither Price nor Wedig returned calls for this story.

Almost three weeks after signing Canuki and Cactus Cafe out of Beulah, facing an Internet campaign to find the horses and the threat of ejection from Mountaineer on top of the Ohio ruling, Wedig called Deluca and told him, “I got them back.” On Preakness weekend, West Virginia state veterinarian John Day identified the horses as the missing pair.

Wedig has signed an affidavit saying he did not send the horses to slaughter, according to Mountaineer racing secretary Rosemary Williams.

“From our legal standpoint, he has complied with everything our legal department has asked,” Williams said.
But Wedig declined to tell Deluca where the horses had been since May 1. Pictures taken shortly before they left Beulah’s backstretch showed both horses in good training condition, except for a gash on one of Canuki’s legs that had been treated and stitched. But Deluca said both were malnourished with abrasions by May 19.

Collecting proof that a horse has fallen into the underground slaughter pipeline is a key problem in enforcing anti-slaughter policies, activists and track officials say.

“The only way you’re going to get proof is to follow them,” rescuer Johnson said of kill buyers. “And they shake it up: They usually pick up on Tuesday, then they move to Thursday, then they skip two weeks and come back on a Wednesday.”

Attorney Maggi Moss, a racehorse owner and anti-slaughter advocate, agreed collecting good evidence is difficult but said enforcement isn’t.

“You have the legal ability as a racetrack or a racing commission to tighten and be more diligent in their enforcement of this rule if they are willing to do it,” Moss said. “Do they have the legal precedent? Yes. Do they have the ability to do it? Absolutely. The problem is, will they do it?”

“From a resource point of view, there’s limitations on what we can do,” said Thoroughbred Racing Associations president Christopher McErlean, who also is vice president of racing for Beulah operator Penn National Gaming. “In general, this whole situation is frustrating, because the racetracks are looked to as the enforcement vehicle or the investigative vehicle, and, quite honestly, they’re not our horses. We don’t own them, we don’t train them. These are property of owners and trainers. They should be the ones responsible for the welfare of these horses.”

Deluca said he would like the Association of Racing Commissioners International to create a model anti-slaughter rule that could create a violation database and levy strong penalties, including loss of a violator’s license. The West Virginia Racing Commission already is moving in that direction by drafting a rule modeled on Mountaineer’s anti-slaughter language. That rule could come into effect in 2013.

Mountaineer racing secretary Williams applauds that effort but also says she believes Mountaineer’s current policy is working.

“This is a prime example of people doing due diligence and people having to explain themselves,” she said of the Canuki/Cactus Cafe incident. “This was a Beulah issue that landed in our lap because [Wedig] was licensed here. Once we found out about it, he had to explain himself. Is it working all the time? I hope so, but I don’t know that.”

Rescue volunteer Mary Johnson said she doesn’t believe racetrack anti-slaughter policies are preventing enough horses from dying in slaughterhouses. But publicizing the disappearances of horses like Canuki and Cactus Cafe might spur racetracks to investigate potential violations.

“I believe the publicity made this possible,” she said of Canuki’s and Cactus Cafe’s return. “The policy has been on the books for a number of years at both Mountaineer and Beulah, and the Thoroughbreds still go to kill.”

Sher Kirk More than 1 year ago
First step get rid of known kill buyers racing horse.
Debbie Tracy More than 1 year ago
You know if we have the will we will have the way, there are all kinds of programs we could have in place like disable vets therapy programs, prison programs, cheaper clinics, I mean this is just a start, I mean if our GOV wants to use MY TAX dollar for slaughter inspections I WANT it put to good use like programs like this it is a win win situation.....Slaughter profits the few and Foriegn interest's with toxic meat while our elected officials SIT and turn thier heads ignoring this HUGE issue........ WE need to STOP ALL SLAUGHTER once and for all and people who own and breed need to be held more accountable and responsible for the horses, you don't just through them away once the money has dried up, like AQHA does dispicable.... Lets ALL get back to what our values are in this country not GREED & MONEY.......... THANKS
JoyJackson21 More than 1 year ago
I always worry about the safety of horses once they are deemed no longer useful. The slaughter industry truly breaks my heart for these noble horses. Canuki and Cactus Cafe need to be taken away from Mr. Wedig. They are not safe in his care! Why would they give them back to the very man who sold them into slaughter in the first place? He's not trustworthy - he's just going to find a way to do another act of horror to both of the horses and sell them again. They were in appaling condition when they were "miraculously" found this time around. I hope they will be safe and that someone out there is keeping an eagle eye on Mr. Wedig's activities concerning both horses. More has to be done immediately to ensure that the anti-slaughter laws are not only enforced, but that they have real "teeth" in them.
Victoria More than 1 year ago
A few years ago with Curlin and up to Zenyatta, I was crazy about racing. Now with the apparent inability of the racing industry to protect its horses, I have lost interest. I just cannot in all good consciousness stay involved with such inhumanity.
April Smith More than 1 year ago
A lot of show horses that are no longer"pretty" or don't win ribbons end up in slaughter after being given "a good home". No one ever checks up on them.
Jo-Claire Corcoran More than 1 year ago
The two largest breeds sent to slaughter are the American Quarter Horse and the Thoroughbred, and of those two breeds, only the thoroughbred industry is making any kind of strides to protect their horses. The AQHA actually supports horse slaughter. We just need to make sure we show the tracks who enforce their anti-slaughter policies support, encourage the racing commissions to make it a regulation and not just a track policy.
Anthony Andrews More than 1 year ago
Unfortunately, this is what happens when the almighty dollar overrides our ability to think in a fair-minded fashion. Do 35,000 foals need to be born every year? Does this not create the mass surplus of unwanted horses? I believe that if the racing industry did more to foster responsible breeding practices slaughter would not be as much of an issue. It's time that the industry put horse welfare front and center stage. Putting the horse first would behoove the racing industry and place its reputation in a better light.
Pamela Clark More than 1 year ago
Canuki and Cactus Cafe should be taken away from Wedig. They are not save with him!
Pamela Clark More than 1 year ago
Canuki and Cactus Cafe should be taken away from Wedig. They are not save with him!
Mary Adkins-Matthews More than 1 year ago
Shame SHAME SHAME on the racing industry for allowing these 2 horses to go to slaughter and now not demanding that they are safe from Mark Wedig who sent them to die
Kathryn Baker More than 1 year ago
Mark Wedig: do the right thing and turn the horses over to a rescue group. You will not escape the wrath of the public and other horse owners and trainers if you continue this stupidity.
Morris More than 1 year ago
horse slaughter is a nessesary evil to the horse industry. it is LEGAL in the USA. it creates a cushion for everyone who makes a living with horses. statisics show that 88% of opponites of the slaughter industry are not horse owners. iam 64 yrs old & have watched the horse market since the days that tractors replaced horse drawn farm implements. i am not a killer buyer, but have run a horse sale. so i think i am qualify to make this statement. I HAVE NEVER KNOWN OF 1 CASE OF A horse carsass being turned down because of being on bute. the opposition against slaughter is mostly ingort & uninformed of the facts. if you dont want your horse to go to the killers, make other arrangements. thats your right. that brings up another subject. -- the adoption process is a joke & a hustle, being fiananced by donated money that comes from bleeding heart organized groups. i have tried repeatedly to adopt exrace horses for retraining purposes. ican go buy horses way cheaper than i can adopt 1. if icould adopt ! at all . all of you who are against slaughter are being used to line the pockets of crooked fram owners whom cant make it in the real horse world. control the slaughter industry, inspect it scrutinize it, clean it up any way you can. but dont ruin the horse industry, for the whole usa. because of a bunch of uninformed bleeding hearts, that only sourse of inforation is hear say.
Rosesette More than 1 year ago
The true facts concerning bute can be found at www.kaufmanzoning.net . The EU has a list of drugs that would completely eliminate a horse for slaughter ,bute and numerous other drugs are named. No oversite is being done when a horse is bought by a buyer or the plant.But like our goverrment,no oversite at all! Bute was being used for humans back in the 50's but was pulled being it had adverse effects on humans! A professional horse person over 40 years here!!
Jodie York More than 1 year ago
Morris, you are a moron, offense to morons.
donnakeen More than 1 year ago
Adoption is not a joke. We work our tails off to retrain these horses to make them useful. Morris, you have no clue. People in the TB industry and fans love our racehorses and do everything we can to keep them safe. I run Remember Me Rescue, not one person in my organization, including me, receives a payment for services. It is all about the horses. I invite you and anyone else that thinks rescue is a scam to come visit our program and see for yourself. The only thing we are guilty of is not getting the word out about all of the success stories out there so people can see all the cool things these retired racehorses do after their racing careers are over.
Jo-Claire Corcoran More than 1 year ago
Morris, please provide us with the documentation that 88% of those opposed are not horse owners... I can tell you I am one of the 80% opposed to horse slaughter and I am a horse owner. The proud owner of a rescued OTTB, from a track which enforces it's no slaughter policy. Really, in most instances when you adopt an OTTB, he has received training and is ready for a new career or maybe, once the program finds out you support slaughter they just refuse to adopt to you. Slaughter encourages neglect and abandonment and overbreeding. A horse that makes it's owners thousands of dollars does not deserve to end up on someone's plate or and Morris... guess what, most every medication used on racehorses is banned by the FDA, CFIA and the EU for use in ANY animal intended for human consumption and that is what horse slaughter is about... food production. We don't raise our horses in this country for food... therefore they are not safe to eat and you're not going to use my tax dollars to pay to inspect a meat not raised for food and which will line the pockets of a few foreign interests.