05/23/2011 12:46PM

Shack Attack

Email

Replays are a wonderful thing. I was alive when there was no such creature, and yes, that makes me a hundred and thirty-eight. Never mind. The Preakness from last Saturday deserves any number of views -- unless you are Graham Motion, then once was enough -- so at one point I turned off the sound, stripped out the colors and disregarded all other distractions save the blaze on the face of the breakaway leader and the determined progress of the horse closing down the middle of the Pimlico stretch.

It was 2009 all over again.

Now, a flashback of only two years hardly qualifies as psychologically troubling. I've got perfectly vivid memories older than that, not to mention those recurring dreams, like Satan's spawn rising from the mouth of my dead Lutheran minister to purge the Earth of righteousness, and the other one about forgetting the combination to my high school locker. Anyway, a little deja vu never did no harm, and I knew I'd seen that 2011 Preakness before.

This time, instead of the little gelding named Mine That Bird trying to run down the big speed filly called Rachel Alexandra, it was a pair of honest chestnut colts in the starring roles. And just as the Derby winner failed to catch the speed horse in 2009, Animal Kingdom came up short last Saturday, as Shackleford seized the day.

In 2009, after his runaway by more than eight lengths in the Derby, Mine That Bird was written off as a New Mexican aberration who benefited from a wet track and a rail trip from Calvin Borel that was by turns exciting and suicidal. Two weeks later at Pimlico, the result was more difficult to spin, since Rachel Alexandra by then had been sanctified as the second coming of Kincsem, and Mine That Bird was still shrouded in denigration. How could a fluke -- even a Derby winning fluke -- come within a length of toppling a saint? On top of that, Mine That Bird even had enough trouble on the final Preakness turn to add a whiff of "what if?" to the equation.

After the Preakness, Mine That Bird's fortunes went south as Rachel's soared. They never met again, but here's hoping the same is not said about this year's entertaining classic winners. If one of the red colts can't be Affirmed, then the least they can do is try to behave like Affirmed and Alydar, if their people will give them the chance.

I also celebrate the deviant nature of the Derby and Preakness winners in terms of how they got their jobs done. The pace in the Derby was agonizingly slow, which meant Animal Kingdom should have had no chance and Shackleford should have held on. By constrast, in the Preakness Shackleford's pressing of a hot pace should have killed him off and set the table for Animal Kingdom to romp. The best, most insightful handicappers went to bed Saturday night scratching their heads raw, only to awaken Sunday morning to the same mysterious racing world in which horses always have the last word.

****

Before turning the page, take one more look at the work of Jesus Castanon through the final quarter mile of the Preakness. It was a clinic.

Having disposed of the desperate Flashpoint, Castanon made the turn into the straightaway with his hands low on Shackleford's neck. He used those hands and a subtle weight shift to key a lead change, then turned his stick inside the three-sixteenth and gave his colt a classic, right-handed series -- one, a pause, then a quick two-three. Message recieved, Shackleford dug in. Castanon threw a shorter cross, and a couple of strides later gave both a backwards glance at Animal Kingdom and his colt another, single crack right-handed. Shackleford, now tiring, shifted slightly left toward Astrology, but Castanon was ready. He pulled his stick through in a blink, and one left-handed smack was all it took for Shackleford to straighten his course and be duly impressed with the urgency of the situation. Castanon spent the last yards showing the whip and hand-riding, a perfect flourish to a virtuoso performance.

gino More than 1 year ago
your last paragraph is race writing at its best, every bit as good as the race riding you describe...
Mona Stern More than 1 year ago
That was a great article. I, too, get tired of seeing the same jockeys over and over. The up-and-coming jocks should be given a chance. - Shackleford was tiring at the end so I don't think he has much of a chance at winning the Belmont. We'll see.
Ed Kay More than 1 year ago
This column gives me a sense of relief, because it's the first one I've seen that at least intimates at the reality of the day: the Preakness was a terrific horse race. This race showcased magnificent animals and their tough, experienced jockeys using all of their professional skills at the highest level of the sport. And this resulted in a thrilling finish. Here was an opportunity to amplify the excitement of our sport for would be fans. But instead of heralding this triumph of sport and entertainment, all of the earlier reports, that I've seen, led with things like, "I was shocked at the result." What makes the folks in your field think that anybody cares that a second rate pundit was shocked in the wake of his second rate handicapping? With all of the talk about the changes that horse racing needs, one of the places to start is to sweep away these old school reporters, pundits who destroy rather than build the sport. Whether they do it by direct attack or by omission, they need to be gone. Instead we need keen analysts, good writers who can appreciate and build on, rather than attack, this foundation - that is a good horse race.
Cheryl More than 1 year ago
I am annoyed that so many feel Shackleford's win should be frowned upon and rationalized away! It is refreshing that at least one commentator is telling it like it was. He and his jockey deserve the win! No rationaizations, Animal Kingdom and the rest of the entiries were behind him. He won fair and square. He has been improving for the last couple of races; this fourth in the Derby showed it. Sure, some of the earlier big players were out of the field. They lacked the health and stamina Shackleford has displayed. He wasn't a late comer to the racing season; with only a couple of races off his maiden; and so to speak, relatively still developing a sense of what it was all about. They were others that were very good horses in both fields in the 2 Triple Crown races as well. We have to consider the stamina and sturdiness of our horses on the track. He was one of those who has gotten better and better, while other 3 year olds considered more talented and more deserving are now retired due to injuries.
bud More than 1 year ago
Velasquez rode a rookie race , plowing in behind horses instead of following wide. Wont mention what I thought of Shackleford pre-gate ...musta been something he ate.
Left Bank More than 1 year ago
It's Velazquez (2 z's) - if you are going to be a miserly curmudgeon, at least spell the name to which your hatred is pointed properly. Go JRV - you are The Man! As for Shack - he won a slow renewal, but he will always be the winner. Haven't seen anyone say otherwise. Thanks, Jay!
bud More than 1 year ago
Hey lefty , over rated VelaZquez ( rides Todd Pletchers addicts )... wont be on Animal Kingdom in the Belmont...after that eyes shut ride...back to Albarado...
Karen More than 1 year ago
Jay, thank you for the article on Graham Motion. He's been a trainer in my virtual stable, my 'if I ever win the lottery and can buy race horses, who would I want to train them' trainer. I think what he and Dale Romans are talking about - building a rivalry between their two horses - is the sporting thing to do and I wish them both the best. That's the sort of thing we need more of, to bring interest back to the game. I've seen more mention of horse racing on mainstream TV and internet this year than I can remember in decades and I think the almost rivalry of Big Brown and Curlin started it, the almost rivalry of Rachel and Zenyatta built on it and now, maybe we'll see the rivals actually face off on the track. We can only hope.
Paul More than 1 year ago
Interesting that MTB was mentioned. His name came up after the Preakness among my friends. The consensus? MTB was 1st in the KD, 2nd in the Preakness, and 3rd in the Belmont. So, if AK does not hit the board, he will have achieved far less than MTB. One day, people may take another look at MTB and realize that he was a true champion whose physical constitution just ran down after a grueling Derby Trail that injured the likes of General Quarters. Some horses aren't as sturdy as others, both mentally and physically. I suspect that Shackleford is going to eat his way back into contention for the Belmont, whereas, Animal Kingdom is probably on a slide downward.
Blamethewinner More than 1 year ago
What a hopelessly poor comparison in an attempt by a Zenyattaphile to smear Rachel Alexandra's Preakness win. There are no similarities between Rachel and Shackleford other than the fact that they're both equines. Animal Kingdom was embraced much differently by the public than Mine That Bird. Take a look at the closing odds for the Preakness, Jay. Take that Z off your chest every once in a while.
Catmom More than 1 year ago
If you followed Shakleford since he first raced you would have seen the only winner in a group of horses that for some reason seem to be not quite stars. Pure hype on Uncle Mo and so forth clouded other horses racing in the Derby and Preakness. It happens every year and I firmly turn off the talking heads and study the horses. Shakleford is a work horse in progress. He is accused of slowing the Kd down so it made it hard for the other horses to follow the pace. WHAT? I recall that all the horses seemed to have 4 legs and were running. No one pulled out to increase the pace until the end. In the Preakness they had every opportunity to run. What held the rest back? Probably lack of TALLENT. Now for the Belmont it won't be who you think. My money is on Astrology ,if he runs, or Nehro.
Lenny More than 1 year ago
You want to know why Ak Lost the Derby?????????? Watch the movie Seabiscuit.
Brigitte More than 1 year ago
Castagnon deserves a huge amount of credit. In the KD he was aware of the pace when others weren't and gave Shackleford an outstanding ride, slowing him after a fast opening quarter. In the Preakness it was another virtuoso performance and this time Animal Kingdom didn't have the extra 16th he needed. I hope Castagnon's career takes off now. I also hope they both run in the Belmont.
Utah More than 1 year ago
Good for Castanon. Im sick and tired of the "big name" jockeys getting too much props for not really doing much. And good for you for pointing out his great ride. Perhaps the next time we see a complete non-effort from a hall of fame rider, we will remember the hungry riders out there looking for a big break.
paul attanasio More than 1 year ago
jay can you please tell me if you think had castonan gone to a left hand whip instead of 20 right hand would shackleford have finished better in the derby???
TheHorsePlay More than 1 year ago
It was a very good ride by Castanon...he hung with Flashpoint, knew he couldn't keep up and he slowed the pace down and had a lead going around the turn and went on and see if anyone could catch Shackelford...he held on, but a great tactic...the Belmont is setting up nicely if everyone from the Derby decide to come back...not everyone, but NEHRO, MASTER OF HOUNDS, STAY THIRSTY, AK, SHACKELFORD, BRILLIANT SPEED...plus the new shippers...three weeks can't come fast enough. http://thehorseplay.gandi-site.net
will More than 1 year ago
Great post Jay. Castanon is not getting enough credit for his ride. I didn't bet Shack (even though that was my high school nickname) and am one of the handicappers confounded as you state. However, I think Castanon's ride was brilliant and underrated both for what you say and for not pressing Flashpoint into a pace that would've been suicidal had they kept it up after that first quarter.
Ron F More than 1 year ago
I couldn't agree more with Castanon's ride.Where far too often so many races and money is lost because of late rider confusion his composure was brilliant .I've been watching races for forty years and The Animal had Shackelford measured until Jesus unmeasured him.
David Dinerman More than 1 year ago
A puzzler. Shack figured to not hit the board again, assuming he would nor run as strong a race as he did in the Derby. He ran the same exact aggressive style, minus 1 furlong. AK? I have never run even one step in my life with someone throwing dirt in my face and chest, so I will buy that excuse. Otherwise, he has less to do and wins again. Astrology apparently has a thing about the number '3,' and wanted to run in the 3rd spot the entire way around the track, no matter which other horses were running 1/2. That is not easy to do. So, I ran 2-3. Close but no Cigar. No, not THAT Cigar!
Chuck More than 1 year ago
I bet AK in the derby and had the exacta........which I included "Shack."It was a big pay day! In the Preakness, I did not include "Shack" based on the thought the pace would be too hot early. So much for insightful handicapping. You just can't be too sure of anything. What I will say now is that Dale Romans is doing a great disservice to his horse by running him back in the Belmont in three weeks. This is a horse who has had three hard races in a row who was life and death to hold on in the Preakness. He might get and easy lead in the Belmont, but I doubt anyone will allow him to get away early without pressure. Graham Motion has admitted his horse had a hard race and was tired afterwards. This is a lightly raced horse without enough bottom to withstand the rigors of three tough races in five weeks. As a former owner who worked for Hall of Fame trainer Johnny Nerud, I think both trainers are not being conservative enough in their planning. Me thinks Barry Irwin is pushing for AK to run in the Belmont...not so much Graham Motion.
Curt V. More than 1 year ago
Hello Jay, Ah! 2009....? When the female Rocketship delivered..Since when does it matter when the 2nd place horse ALMOST gets there ? They pay the big $$$$ on who gets to the finish line 1st..& who cares if it wasn't that fast a time in 2011..If it wasn't that fast, then why didn't Animal Kingdom get there 1st ? I'll tell you why..Because he isn't fast enough...That's not Shacklefords problem is it ? It's Animal Kingdoms problem, No ? ZZZZZZZZZ didn't have much of a problem getting there, did she ? The better horse usually wins..BUTTS: you're right about the ride from JC....Just because the Big Girl Z..did it, doesn't make it so..Tell Johnny V. to start running early, & act like a real race horse...you know, like the kind that are actually deserving of Triple Crown material... I watched the gallop out. Never, never did AK pass the Shack around the clubhouse turn. AK was one dead tired horse...That's his problem, not Shacks......
Patti D. More than 1 year ago
Thank you so much for writing positive things about Mine That Bird. So many columnists give him no respect for his achievements - Champion Canadian 2 yr. old, Kentucky Derby winner, 2 strides short of being a Preakness winner, third in the Belmont. As a loyal Mine That Bird fan, I appreciate all the times you've written positively about him. As for the Preakness, I was yelling my head off for Animal Kingdom coming down the stretch, even though I thought he was too far back for most of the race. I think the first two legs of the Triple Crown were exciting races and look forward to seeing Animal Kingdom and Shackleford go for the rubber match in the Belmont.
steve morehouse More than 1 year ago
Other than the opening quarter, the pace of the preakness was'nt that fast.