12/02/2013 10:07AM

Pace Strategies, and Other Notes

Email

Clutching, grabbing, dumb … there are a lot of things you can call it. But the phenomenon of jockeys literally taking the speed out of American racing is not a new one. It began decades ago on the turf side of the game with more and more of our grass races run in the European style of slow early, fast late, and it has evolved to the point now where a turf route here with an honest pace is more the exception rather than the rule.

What is a fairly recent development, however, is this is now happening with greater frequency in our dirt races. Every day, for reasons that often remain a mystery to the general betting public, speed horses are taken back out of the gate, usually with profound repercussions. These horses concede their primary advantage (their speed), and far more often than not, that puts them at a disadvantage they are unable to overcome. Moreover, a speed horse unexpectedly taking back frequently results in another speed horse finding himself alone on an uncontested lead, completely altering the complexion of the race in ways that no one without prior knowledge of the strategy could have foreseen. And as every bettor knows, the most dangerous horse in dirt racing is the one with an uncontested early lead.

But this clutching and grabbing thing in our dirt racing may have reached critical mass Saturday in the Remsen at Aqueduct. We can only hope. This Remsen was supposed to be an important event. It had Honor Code, the future book Kentucky Derby favorite in Las Vegas, and another immensely promising prospect in Cairo Prince. Instead, this Remsen was a joke. Here’s why:

25.84, 52.74, and 1:17.56.

Those were the early fractions of the Remsen, run at nine furlongs around two turns. Two races and one hour earlier at Aqueduct, on a day when weather was no factor whatsoever, Wedding Toast won the Comely Stakes, also at nine furlongs around two turns, after setting fractions of 23.82, 48.04, and 1:11.98. I know it was a different sort of race with good older horses, but in the race before the Remsen, the one turn Cigar Mile, the fractions were 22.59, 45.39, and 1:09.79. This only helps to underscore how ridiculous the Remsen pace was.

I mean, raise your hand if you thought Honor Code would be running ahead of Cairo Prince turning into the backstretch. No one? That’s what I thought.

Because of the pace, or more accurately, the lack of it, this Remsen was unable to fulfill one of its primary functions. Oh, Honor Code proved good and game Saturday to come back and gain the narrow decision, but we already knew he was good and game after his second in the Champagne. Cairo Prince was also good and game, but we already knew he was good after his Nashua win. We did learn that third place finisher Wicked Strong is an improving colt, but let’s not go overboard on how well he was going at the finish. It wasn’t like Wicked Strong came from 10 miles out if it. He was right with Cairo Prince in the run down the backstretch, and only fell marginally back in the fourth quarter mile because the pace finally heated up, and he couldn’t keep up at that particular point.

However, one of the new things this Remsen should have demonstrated was if Honor Code could have better positional speed against an honest route pace. This was not an insignificant point for a Derby favorite who showed a tendency in his first two starts to almost lose contact with the field early. This Remsen was also supposed to show us if Cairo Prince could be as effective in a legitimate two turn event. We will have to wait for another day to find all of this out. Yes, Honor Code was much closer early, but only because they were walking. Yes, Cairo Prince stayed on Saturday, but who knows if he will be able to stay a route when he has to work harder to remain close to an honest (meaning much faster) route pace. This Remsen was entertaining, with a rousing finish. But because of the way it was run, it proved nothing.

Something must be done to nip this grabbing epidemic in the bud, and it falls on the stewards. It is the responsibility of the stewards to ensure reasonably formful racing. But when a jockey of one speed horse takes back enabling another speed horse to shake loose, or when a horse (Cairo Prince) is running behind a horse (Honor Code) that he figured to be 10 lengths in front of early, that is not formful racing.

Stewards should be aggressive, demand explanations for why horses were ridden the way they were when the situation calls for it, and (this is important) be transparent with their findings. And that is because if horseplayers can’t rely on something as basic as a speed duel happening when it is supposed to happen, then the intellectual aspect of handicapping is undermined, and the game devolves into something as random as the spin of a roulette wheel.

Some quick thoughts on some other Thanksgiving weekend happenings:

By virtue of his victory in the Grade 1 Clark Handicap over older horses, it is obviously much, much easier to vote for Will Take Charge to be champion 3-year-old male. In fact, you can now make the case that with his Travers and Pennsylvania Derby wins, and near miss in the Breeders’ Cup Classic to go along with his Clark, Will Take Charge owned the last third to half of the season in a way no other 3-year-old male owned the first part of the year. It is amazing how one win can change your perspective.

That said, I suspect both Will Take Charge and Game On Dude, who was beaten just a head in the Clark, are on a downward form cycle. I think the Clark’s slow final eighth of 13.20 and the modest winning Beyer of 101 prove that. But that doesn’t mean either can’t cycle back up again.

I think the toll of competing at a high level over a series of starts might have also shown in Tiz Flirtatious’s fifth as the favorite in the Matriarch. Still, you can’t take anything away from the improving Egg Drop, who was the definition of game coming again to win the photo.

We saw the good Flat Out in the Cigar Mile and I feel that’s partly because at this point in a career that now might be over, a mile is his best distance.

While on the Cigar Mile, I liked Private Zone in the Breeders’ Cup Sprint, in which he went off at less than 7-2. I know Private Zone didn’t run well in the Sprint, but his prior form was excellent, and I have no idea how he was let go at 32-1 Saturday. He finished a terrific second. I also thought Groupie Doll was an excellent fourth and Clearly Now was a fine fifth, both after significant trouble. Groupie Doll should win next time.

If Got Lucky moved out to split Penwith and Stopchargingmaria into the stretch instead of diving to the rail inside of Penwith, I think she would have won the Demoiselle.

But I wasn’t enthralled with the Demoiselle, or with the Golden Rod or Kentucky Jockey Club, either. My belief is Stonetastic is a nice filly, but is, at least at this point in her career, distance challenged. So for her to hold on and be beaten only two lengths finishing third in the Golden Rod makes me skeptical of the first two finishers, Vexed and Bird Maker.

As for the Kentucky Jockey Club, the race lost a lot with the scratch of Almost Famous. In his absence, Tapiture registered a decisive maiden-breaking win. But even though Tapiture won going away, he ran only 32 hundredths of a second faster than Vexed did winning the Golden Rod, with comparable paces.

Jimmy Metzger More than 1 year ago
No offense to anyone, but this seems like a total non-issue to me. Is there a particular jockey or trainer who anyone thinks was trying to lose the race? Otherwise, I think it's silly for people to be complaining about the pace scenario not being what they handicapped it to be. Obviously, pace makes the race, and if predicting the pace scenario were easy, people would be able to pick winners fairly simply, meaning more chalky winners. I've always found that triple crown prep races are great spots for betting on front-runners, since a lot of connections use these races to teach their charges to rate early, which is often the preferred strategy for winning the Derby (though I think that will become less the case now, with the exclusion of sprint GSW).
Steve S More than 1 year ago
Learning and using pace will NOT pick chalky winners. It will help throw out more of the chalk. I developed into a good pace handicapper and can tell you from experience that Chalk is the last thing you will end up with on a regular basis.
anonymous More than 1 year ago
It's not a non-issue, and the rest of your post about triple crown prep races is totally inaccurate nonsense, horses have their own tendencies to be front runners or not, they don't train them all to be front runners as a strategy. Watchmaker was making a specific point about recent dirt races, of all kinds, big and small. I can concur that at Belmont and Aqueduct this fall, one or more front runners who also were often the favorites, fell back in many of the day to day races, and never recovered, whether it was 6 furlongs or 9. Whoever decided to do this should be sued, and as Watchmaker said, have the stewards correct it. The most egregious example was the Preakness, with the midpack horse Oxbow grabbing the lead. Just ridiculous. I hate closers anyhow.
zerosumzen More than 1 year ago
A 'solution' might be to hold jocks accountable here, online at drf. Keep a listing of races where a jockey clearly impacted the race by holding back a speed horse, etc. Name them by name. Once it's public knowledge who is cheating, those riders are risking their livelihoods.
Horse Cents More than 1 year ago
Oh come on Zero, you're saying any jock who tries to control the front speed is "cheating"? This is out of control. Please also keep track of any jock who wings it out front without need, tires, and finishes off the board. Please stop the insanity.
zerosumzen More than 1 year ago
Two speeds in race 8 at Aqueduct today (12/5/13). But one (the #1) is left at the gate. Just check the video. Jockey was J L Ortiz. He wouldn't have won the race on this longshot, but he would have impacted the race with a speed duel. So this kind of activity, especially for the connections of a longshot, could be lucrative. 'You're not going to win the race, but I pay you this much to stay away from the front".
zerosumzen More than 1 year ago
You could actually prove statistically if there is cheating and how much of it. Because the best cheating scenario is the race with two speeds. Reduce it to one speed and the whole complexion of the race changes. So if you see a speed horse left at the gate in such a race (with two speeds) far more often than in a race with three speeds you know that the horse bettor is being taken for a ride.
Steve S More than 1 year ago
You sound like a disgruntled loser at the track. Calm down.
Steve S More than 1 year ago
How is it cheating to try and steal a race with a slow pace. There is nothing wornf with this tactic. I say give 'em a raise in pay if they steal once by figuring they can get away with a 1:17 and change!
Karen More than 1 year ago
Can't imagine the disastrous results we'd get if stewards became involved in assessing the 'fairness' of pace. The horses may as well stay in the barn if the people in the steward's box were going to decide how the race should be run.
ENAMMELD More than 1 year ago
Actually in harness racing that's exactly what happens, as the horses in a specific race, depending on the class level, are required to run a minimum time when on the lead at each point of call. This insures an honest pace every time.
W.G. More than 1 year ago
You'll see things like what happened in the Remsen change when some trainer decides to send a horse on a "bottom out" mission, go 1:09 and change for three-quarters in a race at nine furlongs or longer where the horse is many lengths in front and romp home in front by many lengths to where the trainers of other horses would have no choice but to re-think their strategies. It seems today that jocks and trainers are too afraid of going too fast early that we now have the opposite problem.
zerosumzen More than 1 year ago
Just skip the 2 year olds. You'll sleep better at night. For quality betting opportunities, I'd scan any MSW or AOC over the hyped up Derby trail. And you may overestimate most jockeys if you think they have a thorough understanding of pace. Many go with their preferred racing styles, rather than the running style of the horse.
Charles Sakach More than 1 year ago
I had to check the chart and watch the race several times in trying to comprehend the lack of pace. The way in which it was ran would suggest a strong head wind in the back stretch. This would hinder the pace to the half mile for sure and push the horses faster in the later stages of the race. Not being at the track, I had to resort to reading the charts because this condition is generally reported. I did not see it mentioned. The only thing I can conclude is that jockeys do not have clocks in their heads. They know that the distance is 9 furlongs and that is a lot for a 2YO, even as they are about to turn 3. The only thing going on in their minds is to stay close and make the move at an opportune time. I can't make a judgement against any of these guys...especially when the result shows the best 2 horses separated by the smallest of margins.
Mike More than 1 year ago
Very reasonable response Charles. One thing I'd like to be specific about is the reason behind my reply in the first place. I also think Mr. Watchmaker has made the same point. We merely used the Remsen as an example of what we've witnessed countless times in the past several months. Many jockeys, especially on the NYRA circuit, consistently wrangle speed horses back, and take them out of their game. Yes, the top 2 choices were first and second in the Remsen, but that fails to happen consistently in other races due to these rating tactics. We're tired of seeing races develop in ways that are completely inconsistent with the horses established running styles. Some of the people that responded fail to understand why this is bad for the game. I submit that this is the essence of our game, and that to not try to address this undermines the integrity of the contests. Despite the inability of some to recognize it, the betting dollar fuels the entire industry and should be protected in anyway possible. Thanks
Yuwipi More than 1 year ago
I certainly agree with your frustration about the front end of the Remsen Mike. It just leaves most everyone with the feeling of not having seen a truly run race. I really think though that these types of scenarios, especially in stake races, are more indicative of fields that are very light in quality or quantity - often both. It creates a situation where jocks on a legit contender can play a footsie cat and mouse game with each other with little likely chance of being threatened by their outgunned rivals. The six other entrants in the Remsen were all over 10-1 (four 30-1 or more). The Comely had seven of nine over 10-1. This goes on all year long, all over the place, and I think this is one of the lousy results of talent spread way too thin. Just my humble opinion.
jimf552 More than 1 year ago
I certainly did not care for the running and not sure how I will view it in handicapping races but the jockeys did nothing wrong and only need to be accountable to their connections.
jimf552 More than 1 year ago
Will Take Charge was clear division leader prior to Clark race and kudos to connections for sending him there!
nick More than 1 year ago
Dear Jim, Guess you must have been out of the country from mid-April to the end of July, and missed all of WTC's races during that time frame, or you would have seen one bad 3 yr old.. And why not run in the Clark? Only one horse in that race ever one a race as large as a Grade 2 stake this side of California. Easy pickings. Horse who was 3rd by 2 lengths couldn't even hit the board in two tries in a Grade 2.
Mike Mac More than 1 year ago
this is why the integrity of racing is challenged whether it b a grade one or a 15k maiden claimer!!somebody better get their act together in ny!!!!